2014
DOI: 10.31285/agro.18.464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume and Taper Equations for P. taeda (L.) and E. grandis (Hill ex. Maiden)

Abstract: Se compararon diferentes ecuaciones de volumen y ahusamiento, evaluando en especial el uso de ecuaciones compatibles, con el objetivo de ser utilizadas en inventarios forestales o sistemas de apoyo a la toma de decisiones. Utilizamos datos de 863 y 932 árboles correspondientes a las especies Pinus taeda y Eucalyptus grandis respectivamente, provenientes de plantaciones situadas en los departamentos de Rivera, Tacuarembó, Paysandú y Río Negro en Uruguay. En general, los rankings de ecuaciones fueron consistente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of statistics of fit of wood including bark volume equations from three studies (the study reported here, Casnati and Muhairwe) provides the following results. The Eucalyptus grandis volume equation(Casnati et al 2014) with its RMSE value of 0.0422 m 3 was comparably more precise than the Eucalyptus globoidea model developed herein (RMSE values 0.1439786 m 3 ). The Eucalyptus globoidea MAB value was higher than the lowest (0.0245 m 3 ) reported for Eucalyptus grandis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison of statistics of fit of wood including bark volume equations from three studies (the study reported here, Casnati and Muhairwe) provides the following results. The Eucalyptus grandis volume equation(Casnati et al 2014) with its RMSE value of 0.0422 m 3 was comparably more precise than the Eucalyptus globoidea model developed herein (RMSE values 0.1439786 m 3 ). The Eucalyptus globoidea MAB value was higher than the lowest (0.0245 m 3 ) reported for Eucalyptus grandis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Model efficiency was the best for Eucalyptus globoidea based on EF value (0.971). The Eucalyptus globoidea taper equation was a less precise model as it had a larger RMSE value (2.474088 cm) compared to Rachid's model (0.8937 cm)(Casnati et al 2014). The MAB value of 1.647877 cm was also higher than the lowest (0.6747 cm) reported for Eucalyptus grandis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in 2002, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2015, 2018, 2019, and 2021. Total individual volume under bark (Vi, m 3 .tree) was estimated applying equation 1 [48], and the total volume per hectare (Vht, m 3 .ha -1 ) was calculated as the sum of individual volumes of each plot, related to one hectare. 𝑉𝑖 = 0.00003242 * 𝐷𝐵𝐻 .…”
Section: Growth and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El análisis de los residuales que resultaron del ajuste del modelo de volumen de En general, el sistema S2 registró la más alta precisión tanto en la estimación del volumen comercial, como del ahusamiento. Los estadísticos de validación de los modelos que conforman el S2, así como la tendencia lineal que forma la relación entre los datos observados contra los estimados prueban que los estimadores de los parámetros del sistema S2 son eficientes (Rachid et al, 2014).…”
Section: Modelounclassified