2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volubility as a mediator in the associations between conversational language measures and child temperament

Abstract: Background Despite support for the use of conversational language measures, concerns remain regarding the extent to which they may be confounded with aspects of child temperament, extraversion in particular. Aims This study of 161 twins from the Western Reserve Reading Project (WRRP) examined the associations between children’s conversational language use and three key aspects of child temperament: Surgency (i.e., introversion/extraversion), Effortful Control (i.e., attention and task persistence), and Negat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At HV3 its loading for the semantic factor was negative, a rather startling result for a supposed indicator of semantic skill. Other researchers have reported a smaller effect size for D than for other measures (Owen & Leonard, 2002;DeThorne et al, 2008); similar results were obtained in two other recent studies of the WRRP data (DeThorne, Petrill, Schatschneider, & Cutting, 2010;DeThorne, Deater-Deckard, Mahurin-Smith, & Petrill, under review), each of which used independently derived values for D. The difficulty, then, is unlikely to be faulty calculation; perhaps it is that the serial type-token ratios from which D is calculated are no more effective than aggregate TTRs in distinguishing between typical and atypical language use (Watkins, Kelly, Harbers, & Hollis, 1995). If a single TTR is not useful in discriminating between typical and impaired language abilities, it is unsurprising that an agglomeration of TTRs is no more so.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…At HV3 its loading for the semantic factor was negative, a rather startling result for a supposed indicator of semantic skill. Other researchers have reported a smaller effect size for D than for other measures (Owen & Leonard, 2002;DeThorne et al, 2008); similar results were obtained in two other recent studies of the WRRP data (DeThorne, Petrill, Schatschneider, & Cutting, 2010;DeThorne, Deater-Deckard, Mahurin-Smith, & Petrill, under review), each of which used independently derived values for D. The difficulty, then, is unlikely to be faulty calculation; perhaps it is that the serial type-token ratios from which D is calculated are no more effective than aggregate TTRs in distinguishing between typical and atypical language use (Watkins, Kelly, Harbers, & Hollis, 1995). If a single TTR is not useful in discriminating between typical and impaired language abilities, it is unsurprising that an agglomeration of TTRs is no more so.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, one can argue that the decrease of NDW/m with sample length in the current study may simply reflect the nature of language production and cannot be used as evidence to suggest that NDW/m is unreliable in shorter samples. To better reflect the reliability of NDW in shorter samples, different methods of adjusting for sample length, other than adjusting the samples by minutes, could be a worthwhile research pursuit (e.g., DeThorne, DeaterDeckard, Mahurin-Smith, Coletto, & Petrill, 2011;McKee, Malvern, & Richards, 2000). Given that NDW/m decreased with sample length in the present study, an ensuing question is whether 10-min conversational samples are appropriate for documenting lexical skills in 3-year-olds.…”
Section: Measure 1 Minmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although socio-emotional adjustment in early childhood can be conceptualized in several ways, studies have often focused on the assessment of temperament. Temperament core dimensions includes negative affect, surgency/extraversion and effortful control which, respectively, have been shown to confer risk for behavioral problems and affective disorders 19 21 , communication development and children’s conversational skills 22 , 23 , and increased risk for the development of externalizing disorders and problems related to attention 19 , 24 , 25 . Finally, the literature on early childhood development has also consistently identified poor cognitive and motor abilities in young children as a shared risk factor in a plethora of neurodevelopmental disorders 26 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%