2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric study of extracellular dopamine near microdialysis probes acutely implanted in the striatum of the anesthetized rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
149
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…anesthetized animal studies, microdialysis shows evidence of tissue disruption of at least 220-250 mm away from the probe (Borland et al, 2005), whereas the MEA showed evidence of some neuroinflammation only 50-100 mm away in a chronic study following 8 weeks in vivo (Rutherford et al, 2007). The temporal resolution of our MEA is an order of magnitude faster than the most sophisticated microdialysis techniques designed for measurement of aminoacid neurotransmitters (Kennedy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…anesthetized animal studies, microdialysis shows evidence of tissue disruption of at least 220-250 mm away from the probe (Borland et al, 2005), whereas the MEA showed evidence of some neuroinflammation only 50-100 mm away in a chronic study following 8 weeks in vivo (Rutherford et al, 2007). The temporal resolution of our MEA is an order of magnitude faster than the most sophisticated microdialysis techniques designed for measurement of aminoacid neurotransmitters (Kennedy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The postsurgery recovery time was between 42 and 48 h. In the previous study (Karkhanis et al, 2014), the recovery time was 18-24 h, and DA levels did not significantly differ between SI and GH rats. A longer recovery time after the surgery has been associated with increased stability of baseline DA levels (Borland et al, 2005). All dialysate samples were collected with an interval of 20 min and were collected for 2 h prior (baseline) to ethanol administration and 100 min after.…”
Section: Microdialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy that MEAs detect neuronally derived glutamate, whereas microdialysis samples extracellular glutamate derived from non-neuronal origins, may be because of the inherent differences in the methodologies. The extensive damage to the local brain area during implantation of the microdialysis probe and the large area of tissue sampled (1-4 mm in length), restricts microdialysis measurements of glutamate to large regions far beyond synapses (Borland et al, 2005;Hillered et al, 2005;Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009;Obrenovitch, 1999, Obrenovitch et al, 2000Timmerman and Westerink 1997). Furthermore, the inadequate temporal resolution of microdialysis (*1-20 min) prevents microdialysis from detecting the rapid dynamic changes in extracellular glutamate that occur in the order of milliseconds to seconds (Diamond, 2005).…”
Section: Calcium Channel Dependent Neuronal Glutamate Release Contribmentioning
confidence: 99%