“…The methods based on spectrophotometry , and chromatography , are widely used for determining Qn. Although these methods yield in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, they employ labor-intensive pretreatment steps, difficult separation procedures, and sophisticated and expensive instruments. , In recent years, electrochemical sensors have come to the forefront for determining some electroactive food and biologically essential substances. − Due to some distinct features of electrochemical methods such as being simple, quick, portable, cost-effective, sensitive, and selective, they have become one of the most encouraging methods for determining Qn. , A wide variety of modified electrodes including single- or multipolymer film-modified electrodes with or without metal nanoparticles, − carbon nanotube-based electrodes with or without polymer films, , molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based electrodes, , and the other ones , have been reported for the determination of Qn, and they are summarized in Table S1. The electrodes composed of a single polymer , have high limit of detection (LOD) values (i.e., 0.17 and 20 μM); the other electrodes have complex and time-consuming preparation steps, ,,− and the supporting surfaces in these studies, i.e., glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs), carbon paste electrodes (CPEs), and paraffin-impregnated graphite disk electrode, have advantages such as being prone to electrocatalysis, resistant to surface contamination, and undesired electrode reactions. − However, they have disadvantages due to being expensive, nondisposable, and requiring pretreatment.…”