2013
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2012.690149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric determination of nitrate in water samples at copper modified bismuth bulk electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the current response of the electrode increased apparently when the nitrate was removed (curve E). This behavior is due to the increase of vacant recognition sites number after removing the template, which enhances the (1) where I p is the peak current, n is the electron transfer number, A is the effective surface area (cm 2 ), D is the diffusion coefficient of K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] in the solution (0.650.10 −5 cm 2 s −1 ), C is the concentration of K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] (mol/cm 3 ), and v is the scan rate (mV s −1 ) [48,49]. Based on (1), the effective surface areas of GCE, GCE/Cu-NPs, GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI, NIP-GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI, and IIP-GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI were calculated to be 0.035, 0.027, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.14 cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterization Of Various Modifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the current response of the electrode increased apparently when the nitrate was removed (curve E). This behavior is due to the increase of vacant recognition sites number after removing the template, which enhances the (1) where I p is the peak current, n is the electron transfer number, A is the effective surface area (cm 2 ), D is the diffusion coefficient of K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] in the solution (0.650.10 −5 cm 2 s −1 ), C is the concentration of K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] (mol/cm 3 ), and v is the scan rate (mV s −1 ) [48,49]. Based on (1), the effective surface areas of GCE, GCE/Cu-NPs, GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI, NIP-GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI, and IIP-GCE/Cu-NPs/PANI were calculated to be 0.035, 0.027, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.14 cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterization Of Various Modifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate is recognized as a significant contaminant in ground water because of its high environmental and human health risks. It is mostly present in aquatic ecosystems and food products [1][2][3]. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended maximum limit for nitrate concentration in drinking water is 10 mg.L −1 [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different type of electrochemical sensors have been exploited in order to quantify nitrates, such as impedimetric [21]; [22], chronoamperometric [23][24][25][26][27], voltammetric [28]; [29][30][31][32][33] and also biosensors [34,35], [36]. As concern the enzymatic biosensors they permit to obtain very low Limit Of Detection (LOD) but the detection is very hard, expensive and time consuming (accurate pH control, many separation and incubation steps) [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Cu nanostructures possess high electrocatalytic activity to reduce NO 3 − in acidic electrolytes. 8 To date, different Cu nanostructure-modified electrodes, such as Cu-modified bismuth bulk electrodes, 9 Cu-modified borondoped diamonds, 10 Cu-modified platinum, 11 and Cu-modified pencil graphite, 8 have been used as electrochemical sensors for NO 3 − detection. Unfortunately, despite their many advantages, pure Cu nanostructure-based electrochemical sensors suffer from short-term chemical stability under catalytic reaction conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%