1999
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage-Activated Currents From Adult Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Antennal Motor Neurons Recorded In Vitro and In Situ

Abstract: Voltage-activated currents from adult honey bee antennal motor neurons were characterized with in vitro studies in parallel with recordings taken from cells in situ. Two methods were used to ensure unequivocal identification of cells as antennal motor neurons: 1) selective backfilling of the neurons with fluorescent markers before dissociation for cell culture or before recording from cells in intact brains, semiintact brains, or in brain slices or 2) staining with a fluorescent marker via the patch pipette du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the three different voltage-sensitive K + currents is a transient Atype K + current, which resembles the shaker-like current of other systems and interacts with a fast voltage-sensitive Na + current during spike generation (Pelz et al, 1999). Similar voltage-sensitive currents have been described in honeybee antennal motor neurons, both in vitro and in situ (Kloppenburg et al, 1999a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Among the three different voltage-sensitive K + currents is a transient Atype K + current, which resembles the shaker-like current of other systems and interacts with a fast voltage-sensitive Na + current during spike generation (Pelz et al, 1999). Similar voltage-sensitive currents have been described in honeybee antennal motor neurons, both in vitro and in situ (Kloppenburg et al, 1999a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In all investigated cell types, the current waveforms and physiological properties of I Ca were typical for voltage-activated Ca 2ϩ currents and in the range of other insect preparations [A. mellifera, antennal motorneurons (Kloppenburg et al, 1999a) and Kenyon cells (Schäfer et al, 1994); D. melanogaster, embryonic neurons (Byerly and Leung, 1988;Saito and Wu, 1991); Gryllus bimaculatus, giant interneurons (Kloppenburg and Hörner, 1998); P. americana, embryonic cockroach neurons (Benquet et al, 1999) and DUM neurons (Wicher and Penzlin, 1994); Manduca sexta, motor neurons (Hayashi and Levine, 1992); S. americana, thoracic neurons (Laurent et al, 1993); Schistocerca gregaria, DUM neurons (Heidel and Pflüger, 2006) and thoracic neurons (Pearson et al, 1993)]. However, a quantitative comparison of the functional properties from I Ca between the different cell types revealed significant differences in some physiologically important parameters (for summary, see supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).…”
Section: Differences Of I Ca Between Cell Typesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…5B). This is a relatively low activation threshold compared with I Ca in uPNs and in many other insect neurons (Byerly and Leung, 1988;Saito and Wu, 1991;Hayashi and Levine, 1992;Laurent et al, 1993;Pearson et al, 1993;Schä-fer et al, 1994;Wicher andPenzlin, 1994, 1997;Kloppenburg and Hörner, 1998;Benquet et al, 1999;Kloppenburg et al, 1999a;Heidel and Pflüger, 2006). In type II LNs, despite the similar activation threshold in both LN types, the half-maximal voltage for activation is significantly more hyperpolarized than in type I LNs (Fig.…”
Section: Voltage-activated Camentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations