2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.107.078902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volpeet al.Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical calculations in the early 1980's showed the feasibility of using rf current drive to stabilize tearing modes [3,4]. The recognition in the late 1990's that bootstrap currents were driving NTMs in hot, collisionless tokamak plasmas [5][6][7][8], led to a resurgence of theoretical work in this area [9][10][11][12][13], to experimental demonstrations of stabilization [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and to continuing intensive attention [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. A variety of rf waves are used to drive current [41], but, for stabilizing the NTM, the most studied methods are electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) [42] and lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) [43].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical calculations in the early 1980's showed the feasibility of using rf current drive to stabilize tearing modes [3,4]. The recognition in the late 1990's that bootstrap currents were driving NTMs in hot, collisionless tokamak plasmas [5][6][7][8], led to a resurgence of theoretical work in this area [9][10][11][12][13], to experimental demonstrations of stabilization [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and to continuing intensive attention [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. A variety of rf waves are used to drive current [41], but, for stabilizing the NTM, the most studied methods are electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) [42] and lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) [43].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its explicit form is now much harder to derive than in the case of the minimal model of section 2. In the case discussed in section 3.1, it is possible (but not necessary) to interpret it in terms of a stochastic integration convention choice (α = 1) [28,29], as explained in section 2, but no such interpretation is possible in the generality of the examples considered in section 3.…”
Section: A Minimal Discrete-time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…noise induced drift (29) The outline of the derivation is provided in appendix D. The second term has the same structure as the noise-induced drift in the Brownian motion case: it is proportional to the product of the original noise coefficient, ( ) σF x , and its spatial derivative (see section 3.1). The proportionality constant depends on the time scales of the problem as [22].…”
Section: Delayed Multiplicative Feedback and Colored Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As counter-intuitive as this may seem, some experiments [34,35] have nonetheless claimed to have found empirical evidence that there could indeed be physical systems where α = 1. We now focus on a discussion of [34,35], noting that [34] has been the subject of a comment [36] and a reply [37]: we will show that some of the arguments in [34] are not well-founded.…”
Section: A Recent Case Study: Anticipating Sde'smentioning
confidence: 99%