Völkerrecht und innerstaatliches Recht

Verdross, Alfred

doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-3596-9_7

Völkerrecht

1955

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-3596-9_7

|View full text |Cite

Völkerrecht und innerstaatliches Recht

Alfred Verdross¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2010

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 7 See Verdross (1914, 1923), Kunz (1924), and the discussion in Starke (1998). Verdross later left behind the pure theory for a neo-thomist naturalist vision (Simma, 1995).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Realism and international law: the challenge of John H. Herz

Sylvest

2010

Int. Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The proliferation, globalization, and fragmentation of law in world politics have fostered an attempt to re-integrate International Law (IL) and International Relations (IR) scholarship, but so far the contribution of realist theory to this interdisciplinary perspective has been meagre. Combining intellectual history, the jurisprudence of IL and IR theory, this article provides an analysis of John H. Herz’s classical realism and its perspective on international law. In retrieving this vision, the article emphasizes the political and intellectual context from which Herz’s realism developed: the study of public law in Germany during the interwar period and in particular the contribution of Hans Kelsen and the pure theory of law to the study of international law. Herz was deeply inspired by Kelsen but he criticized the pure theory for ignoring the sociological foundations of law. Following his emigration to the United States, Herz embraced realism but without disregarding international law. Indeed, his mature, globally oriented realism offers a balanced, fruitful perspective for thinking about the relationship between politics and law that is deeply relevant for contemporary theory: it challenges modern, law-blind variants of realism and holds considerable potential for contributing to the approaches that have most successfully studied the law–politics nexus.

show abstract

“… 7 See Verdross (1914, 1923), Kunz (1924), and the discussion in Starke (1998). Verdross later left behind the pure theory for a neo-thomist naturalist vision (Simma, 1995).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Realism and international law: the challenge of John H. Herz

Sylvest

2010

Int. Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Völkerrecht und innerstaatliches Recht

Cited by 1 publication

References 1 publication

Realism and international law: the challenge of John H. Herz

Realism and international law: the challenge of John H. Herz

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About