2018
DOI: 10.15406/iratj.2018.04.00153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volitional control of an active prosthetic ankle: a survey

Abstract: In this work, state of the art in the field of intent recognition, its application to prostheses and subsequent volitional control algorithms are reviewed. In this paper, competitive landscape is also studied with the aim to learn from the successes and failures of the researchers who have been working in this area. This research hopes to further advance the technology for volitional control of prostheses/wearable robots that will enable much integrated human robot collaboration/interaction specifically focuse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a control scheme, the amputee directly or indirectly interacts with the prosthesis to change its state. It can be based on intent recognition algorithms, or it can refer to the use of manual switches [92]. EMG signals are typically used for direct control of prosthetic arms and legs.…”
Section: Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a control scheme, the amputee directly or indirectly interacts with the prosthesis to change its state. It can be based on intent recognition algorithms, or it can refer to the use of manual switches [92]. EMG signals are typically used for direct control of prosthetic arms and legs.…”
Section: Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods of reading human intentions are shown in Table 5. By using a different type of approach, volitional control/intent recognition, it is possible to lower the pressure on the pattern and motion recognition algorithms; however, as discussed in Redkar and Bhat G (2018) and Tucker et al (2015), this method requires high precision and focus from the user's site. Overcoming this issue requires a combination of volitional control on high-precision movements and pattern recognition for locomotion and gait changes.…”
Section: Customizable For Sensors and Other Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, magnetometer components are very sensitive to environmental ferromagnetic disturbances, which may cause a considerable amount of inaccuracy in IMU heading measurements . The definition of local coordinate systems, when comparing IMU‐based systems with OMC systems (considered as the gold standard), can carry influential biomechanical model differences which contribute into the poor estimation of lower hip joint angles in frontal and transverse planes compared with the sagittal plane . Furthermore, gyroscopes are sensitive to vibration shocks—typically occurring when feet hit the ground—and can affect the accuracy of tracking certain joints …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%