2015
DOI: 10.1038/nature14584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volcanic–plutonic parity and the differentiation of the continental crust

Abstract: The continental crust is central to the biological and geological history of Earth. However, crustal heterogeneity has prevented a thorough geochemical comparison of its primary igneous building blocks-volcanic and plutonic rocks-and the processes by which they differentiate to felsic compositions. Our analysis of a comprehensive global data set of volcanic and plutonic whole-rock geochemistry shows that differentiation trends from primitive basaltic to felsic compositions for volcanic versus plutonic samples … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More debate has always surrounded the I-type granites, with some arguing for a direct and sometimes major mantle input to the magmas (e.g. DePaolo et al 1992;Douce 1999;Soesoo 2000;Sisson et al 2004;Gray and Kemp 2009;Nandedkar et al 2014;Keller et al 2015) and others pointing out that what could be interpreted as a relatively juvenile mantle isotope signature, or a mixed crust-mantle source, could be explained just as readily in terms of partial melting of crustal igneous rocks, themselves not long extracted from the mantle (e.g. Whalen et al 2002;Waight et al 2007;Clemens et al 2011a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More debate has always surrounded the I-type granites, with some arguing for a direct and sometimes major mantle input to the magmas (e.g. DePaolo et al 1992;Douce 1999;Soesoo 2000;Sisson et al 2004;Gray and Kemp 2009;Nandedkar et al 2014;Keller et al 2015) and others pointing out that what could be interpreted as a relatively juvenile mantle isotope signature, or a mixed crust-mantle source, could be explained just as readily in terms of partial melting of crustal igneous rocks, themselves not long extracted from the mantle (e.g. Whalen et al 2002;Waight et al 2007;Clemens et al 2011a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The restite continued to sink and settle to the bottom of the felsic layer. This is similar to the fractional crystallization process proposed for forming modern felsic crust [32]. Much of the restite would re-enter the mantle, but some would solidify to form a thermal barrier around the felsic crust thereby allowing a keel to form beneath the Archean crust.…”
Section: Global Continental Crust Formationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…3). However, in this case, crystal fractional curves represent globally averaged melting conditions rather than the evolution of a single, co-genetic magma suite (Keller and Schoene, 2012;Keller et al, 2015). Compatible elements yield concave-down patterns, which for younger time slices are displaced to lower values at any given SiO 2 concentration (Fig.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%