2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2017-1200
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volcanic impact on the climate – the stratospheric aerosol load in the period 2006–2015

Abstract: Abstract. We present a study on the stratospheric aerosol load during 2006-2015, discuss the influence from volcanism and other sources, and reconstruct an AOD data-set in a resolution of 1° latitudinally and 8 days timewise. Our attempt is to include the "entire" stratosphere, from the tropopause to the almost particle free altitudes of the mid-stratosphere. A dynamic tropopause of 1.5 PVU was found to be the best suited one, enclosing almost all of the volcanic signals in the CALIOP dataset. New methods were… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Red dashed line shows predictions from EVA_H with a fixed 25 km injection height. (c) Global mean SAOD time series (525 nm) from observations (GloSSAC and ; Friberg et al, ) and EVA_H using the volcanic SO 2 emission databases used in the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA‐MIP, Timmreck et al, ): Bingen et al () (VolcDB1, 1997–2012), Neely and Schmidt () (VolcDB2, 1990–2014), Carn et al () (VolcDB3, 1979–2015), and the subset of the strongest eight eruptions over 1998–2012 with parameters (SO 2 mass and height) averaged from all other databases used in Timmreck et al ().…”
Section: Comparison Of Eva_h With Eva and Interactive Stratospheric Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red dashed line shows predictions from EVA_H with a fixed 25 km injection height. (c) Global mean SAOD time series (525 nm) from observations (GloSSAC and ; Friberg et al, ) and EVA_H using the volcanic SO 2 emission databases used in the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA‐MIP, Timmreck et al, ): Bingen et al () (VolcDB1, 1997–2012), Neely and Schmidt () (VolcDB2, 1990–2014), Carn et al () (VolcDB3, 1979–2015), and the subset of the strongest eight eruptions over 1998–2012 with parameters (SO 2 mass and height) averaged from all other databases used in Timmreck et al ().…”
Section: Comparison Of Eva_h With Eva and Interactive Stratospheric Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b, 380-470 K). 17 These aerosol clouds reached approximately the same altitude in the same season, when the extratropical downward transport in the Brewer-Dobson circulation is weak. 40 The wildfire shows decline already within the first two weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this period the conditions in the LMS varied due to influence from volcanism. 8,17 To avoid effects of strong variability in the data set, only periods of relatively weak volcanic impact were used. 10 Data from that month was not used either.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extinction profiles required for this correction are derived from the closest pressure and temperature profiles available from MERRA-2. While the effect of the aerosol extinction could also be included in the calculation or corrected using an iterative approach (Friberg et al, 2018), its contribution is small for the cases presented in this study and compared to other uncertainty sources.…”
Section: Backscatter Coefficient Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%