2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-4005-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volcanic ash modeling with the online NMMB-MONARCH-ASH v1.0 model: model description, case simulation, and evaluation

Abstract: Abstract. Traditionally, tephra transport and dispersal models have evolved decoupled (offline) from numerical weather prediction models. There is a concern that inconsistencies and shortcomings associated with this coupling strategy might lead to errors in the ash cloud forecast. Despite this concern and the significant progress in improving the accuracy of tephra dispersal models in the aftermath of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull and 2011 Cordón Caulle eruptions, to date, no operational online dispersal model is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The version (v1.0) of the NMMB-MONARCH model used here contributes to different model inter-comparisons like the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP) initiative and the Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System (SDS-WAS), a project developed under the umbrella of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) with a focus on improving the capabilities of sand and dust storm forecasts. For brevity reasons, only the main characteristics of the model are discussed here since a thorough description is provided in Pérez et al (2011, and references therein) as well as in recent publications presenting its developments and applications in gas-phase chemistry (Badia et al, 2017), volcanic ash dispersion (Marti et al, 2017) and data assimilation (Di Tomaso et al, 2017) studies. The spectral variation of the GOCART dust optical properties, utilized as inputs to the radiation transfer scheme, is presented in Sect.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The version (v1.0) of the NMMB-MONARCH model used here contributes to different model inter-comparisons like the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP) initiative and the Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System (SDS-WAS), a project developed under the umbrella of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) with a focus on improving the capabilities of sand and dust storm forecasts. For brevity reasons, only the main characteristics of the model are discussed here since a thorough description is provided in Pérez et al (2011, and references therein) as well as in recent publications presenting its developments and applications in gas-phase chemistry (Badia et al, 2017), volcanic ash dispersion (Marti et al, 2017) and data assimilation (Di Tomaso et al, 2017) studies. The spectral variation of the GOCART dust optical properties, utilized as inputs to the radiation transfer scheme, is presented in Sect.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using satellite data alone it seems quite difficult to identify volcanic ice from ice formed in meteorological clouds when no ash is present. Detailed models of volcanic plumes [75][76][77] that include thermodynamics are needed in addition to measurements. Incorporation of meteorological data or using transport and weather forecasting models will assist in diagnosing the circumstances favourable to ice formation in volcanic clouds.…”
Section: Case Study: Manam Png 31 July 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This synthetic application reduces the differences associated with the source term (i.e., different source term quantification because of different wind fields) and allows us to isolate the systematic errors coming from the offline coupling approach. Within this framework, we limited the eruption duration to 12 h, using a constant column height and employing the Mastin et al (2009) relationship (mass eruption rate vs. column height) for the dispersion evaluation of a single bin of ash (one particle class) during the first 48 h of the event. Multiple regional simulations of NMMB-MONARCH-ASH were performed to produce four different offline coupled forecasts, in which meteorological variables are updated at the specified coupling intervals (i.e., 1, 3, 6, and 12 h).…”
Section: Synthetic Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, offline forecasts for the Eyjafjallajökull event tend to overpredict towards the north of the plume and to underpredict towards the south. While results of the 1 h offline fore- Woodhouse -Woodhouse et al, 2013;Mastin -Mastin et al, 2009;Degruyter -Degruyter and Bonadonna, 2012); (c) resulting MER for each coupling strategy (meteorology coupled online or with intervals of time of 1, 3, 6, and 12 h) with the Degruyter option only. Figure 6.…”
Section: Modeling Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%