2019
DOI: 10.1108/jes-01-2017-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility spillover from the Chinese stock market to E7 and G7 stock markets

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine volatility spillover from the Chinese stock market to E7 and G7 stock markets. Using the estimated results, the authors also analyze the optimal weights and optimal hedge ratios for the portfolios including stocks from E7 and G7 countries. Design/methodology/approach The authors employed generalized vector autoregressive-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity approach, developed by Ling and McAleer (2003), in order to analyze daily data on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We instead observe that the degree of synchronization between these markets responds positively to geopolitical risk at a higher quantile of GPR [0.65-0.9] and at a middle quantile of synchronization [0.4]. Our findings are consistent with those of Kirkulak Uludag and Khurshid (2019), who document that volatility spillovers between China and the US are more profound than those between China and Russia. Although Balcilar et al (2018) argue that Russia and China are more reactive to geopolitical risks than other BRICS, their stock markets' co-movement remain less responsive to external geopolitical risk due to their strategic relationship.…”
Section: The Response Of Stock Market Synchronization To Geopolitical...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We instead observe that the degree of synchronization between these markets responds positively to geopolitical risk at a higher quantile of GPR [0.65-0.9] and at a middle quantile of synchronization [0.4]. Our findings are consistent with those of Kirkulak Uludag and Khurshid (2019), who document that volatility spillovers between China and the US are more profound than those between China and Russia. Although Balcilar et al (2018) argue that Russia and China are more reactive to geopolitical risks than other BRICS, their stock markets' co-movement remain less responsive to external geopolitical risk due to their strategic relationship.…”
Section: The Response Of Stock Market Synchronization To Geopolitical...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Investors can effectively benefit from diversification only if the portfolio comprises stock indices with low interdependence levels. Several empirical studies have also found significant evidence of volatility spillover between major stock indices (Abbas et al , 2013; Baele, 2005; Hamao et al , 1990; Ng, 2000; Uludag and Khurshid, 2019). Also, many studies conclude that the linkages between global stock indices increased sharply due to global financial shocks, resulting in a contagion situation (Arshanapalli and Doukas, 1993; Jawadi et al , 2015; Vo and Ellis, 2018).…”
Section: Key Factors Influencing Stock Market Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%