2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-016-9493-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility of network indices due to undersampling of intraspecific variation in plant–insect interactions

Abstract: the robustness of commonly applied network indices, confirm the urge for a sufficient and representative sampling of interactions, and emphasize the significance of intraspecific variation in the context of communities and networks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraspecific variation is increasingly recognized as an important factor in the study of ecological networks, with several recent studies demonstrating its potential in influencing network structure (Woodward et al 2010, Gilljam et al 2011, Barbour et al 2016, Kuppler et al 2017. Despite this, no work has directly addressed how the variation that exists across an individual's ontogeny (e.g., its life stages) affect structure, despite its ubiquity and potential importance in influencing network structure (Werner andGilliam 1984, Rudolf andLafferty 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intraspecific variation is increasingly recognized as an important factor in the study of ecological networks, with several recent studies demonstrating its potential in influencing network structure (Woodward et al 2010, Gilljam et al 2011, Barbour et al 2016, Kuppler et al 2017. Despite this, no work has directly addressed how the variation that exists across an individual's ontogeny (e.g., its life stages) affect structure, despite its ubiquity and potential importance in influencing network structure (Werner andGilliam 1984, Rudolf andLafferty 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals within the same species vary in their size, morphology, behavior, and physiology (Bolnick et al 2002, Woodward et al 2010. Such variation can result in differences in the ecological interactions that individuals of a given species are part of, which in turn may scale up to community-wide changes in ecological network structure and dynamics (Woodward et al 2010, Bolnick et al 2011, Gilljam et al 2011, Kuppler et al 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Kuppler et al. () showed that high intraspecific variation coupled with low sampling effort leads to unreliability of aggregated network statistics such as modularity. On the other hand, sampling at the individual level would also increase the degree of spatial heterogeneity captured within a plant population, potentially capturing more variation in pollinator assemblages and a higher number of HP morphotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HP networks, however, as with other types of species interaction networks, are subject to sampling bias and statistical limitations associated with insufficient sampling effort (VVázquez et al., ; Blüthgen, ; Rivera‐Hutinel et al., ; Kuppler et al., ). Surprisingly, the number of stigmas observed to score HP deposition has been highly variable both within and across studies of HP transfer networks (3 to >30 stigmas per species; e.g., Fang and Huang, ; Emer et al., ; Tur et al., ), and in some cases the sampling effort for the species studied is not clearly disclosed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation