2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility of indoor and outdoor ultrafine particulate matter near a freeway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the dependence of dynamometer tests on dilution conditions, assessment of the volatility of vehicular PM emissions under real-world conditions is needed. A previous roadside study measured the volatility of ultrafine PM downwind of a mixed heavy-and light-duty traffic freeway at two different distances both indoors and outdoors (Kuhn et al 2005). The current study measured PM volatility properties next to a pure gasoline freeway where heavy-duty diesel vehicles are prohibited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, given the dependence of dynamometer tests on dilution conditions, assessment of the volatility of vehicular PM emissions under real-world conditions is needed. A previous roadside study measured the volatility of ultrafine PM downwind of a mixed heavy-and light-duty traffic freeway at two different distances both indoors and outdoors (Kuhn et al 2005). The current study measured PM volatility properties next to a pure gasoline freeway where heavy-duty diesel vehicles are prohibited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The heater used to condition the aerosol is described in Kuhn et al (2005). The Aerosol Instrument Manager software (version 5.2, TSI Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) was used for inversion of the measured number concentrations (CPC of SMPS2) to the size distribution.…”
Section: Particle Volatility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, d S increases both indoors and outdoors in the evening as the temperature drops, which, as argued earlier, is probably due to condensational growth of the particles at that time. However, the mean indoor diameter is always slightly lower than the outdoor (except between 3:00-5:00), which may be due to some particle evaporation as the aerosol is transported in the warmer indoor environment (Kuhn et al 2005;Lunden et al 2003;Sarnat et al 2006). For example, particulate compounds such as ammonium nitrate and organic species, which may account for 35-60% of outdoor PM 2.5 mass in the Los Angeles basin (Kim et al 2000;Tolocka et al 2001), volatilize as they entrain indoors (Lunden et al 2003).…”
Section: Mean Surface Diametermentioning
confidence: 99%