2018
DOI: 10.1002/fut.21922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility jumps and macroeconomic news announcements

Abstract: While prior literature documents a link between macroeconomic news and price jumps, this paper demonstrates two channels through which economic announcements also manifest in volatility jumps. First, there is a strong coincidence of volatility jumps with scheduled announcements. Second, the mean jump size is an asymmetric function of the news surprise, with bad news resulting in larger jumps than good news. Furthermore, realized volatility (RV) and option‐implied volatility (IV) behave very differently over th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, a difference between low-debt and high-debt countries exists for the unconventional policy effects, with both the announcement and the implementation effect being higher in the case of FTSEMIB and IBEX35. In line with other researches, ϕ is positive (e.g., Bomfim 2003;Chan and Gray 2018;Lacava et al 2020;Shogbuyi and Steeley 2017), whereas δ is negative (see, among others, Eser and Schwaab 2016;Fratzscher et al 2016;Ghysels et al 2017;Lacava et al 2020). This leads to the first important result that volatility decreased because of the unconventional policy implementation, even if it increased on monetary policy announcement days.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Not surprisingly, a difference between low-debt and high-debt countries exists for the unconventional policy effects, with both the announcement and the implementation effect being higher in the case of FTSEMIB and IBEX35. In line with other researches, ϕ is positive (e.g., Bomfim 2003;Chan and Gray 2018;Lacava et al 2020;Shogbuyi and Steeley 2017), whereas δ is negative (see, among others, Eser and Schwaab 2016;Fratzscher et al 2016;Ghysels et al 2017;Lacava et al 2020). This leads to the first important result that volatility decreased because of the unconventional policy implementation, even if it increased on monetary policy announcement days.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For what concerns the unconventional policy proxies, coe cients are significant at 1% level and they enter the model with the expected sign. According to other researches in literature (see for example Bomfim (2003); Chan and Gray (2018) and Shogbuyi and Steeley (2017)) the coe cient ' of the dummy variable is positive, meaning that there is an immediate reaction in the market on announcement days. Conversely, is negative, therefore the unconventional policies implementation successfully reduces stock market volatility, as expected.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, one inherent assumption utilized in this study was that intraday volatility in higher frequencies incorporates news announcements as revealed in recent studies (Chan & Gray, 2018;Kenourgios, Papadamou, & Dimitriou, 2015), Yet, even beyond the scope of this particular study, the impact of news announcements can be…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%