1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05211.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility in Wheat Spot and Futures Markets, 1950–1993: Government Farm Programs, Seasonality, and Causality

Abstract: We explore how wheat spot and futures market volatility has been impacted by government farm programs during the 1950–1993 period. We find that changing volatility in both markets is highly associated with changing farm programs. The mandatory allotment programs of the 1950s and early 1960s (1/3/50–4/10/64) were associated with low volatility, while the voluntary programs initiated in the mid 1960s seem to have induced high volatility (4/11/64–12/22/85). Both market‐driven loan rates and conservation reserve p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that government farm programs can distort agricultural cash and futures price relationships (Crain & Lee, 1996;Shonkwiler & Maddala, 1985) has not yet received attention in the cointegrationbased literature. Although U.S. farm policies did not directly regulate the market price, it affected agricultural market prices via several price-support tools, including deficiency payments and market loan rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that government farm programs can distort agricultural cash and futures price relationships (Crain & Lee, 1996;Shonkwiler & Maddala, 1985) has not yet received attention in the cointegrationbased literature. Although U.S. farm policies did not directly regulate the market price, it affected agricultural market prices via several price-support tools, including deficiency payments and market loan rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They range from stocks (Chang et al, 1993;Tong, 2000;Basher & Sadorsky, 2006); to bonds (Gibbons & Hess, 1981;Johnston et al, 1991;Jordan & Jordan, 1991); to exchange rates (McFarland et al, 1982;Hsieh, 1988); to commodities (Chiang & Tapley, 1983;Gay & Kim, 1987;Crain & Lee, 1996); to precious metals (Ball et al, 1982;Ma, 1986), in spot and futures markets in countries from around the world. There are sixteen studies which investigate the international evidence relating to stock indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include Hamao et al (1990), Engle and Susmel (1993), Lin et al (1994), Koutmos and Booth (1995), Karolyi (1995), Kim and Rui (1999), Wang et al (2002), and Cifarelli and Paladino (2005). There were also studies on volatility spillovers between spot and futures markets, such as stock indices (Chin et al 1991;Booth and So 2003), interest rates (Crain and Lee 1995), refined petroleum (Ng and Pirrong 1996), wheat (Crain and Lee 1996), and foreign exchange (Wang and Wang 2001). Volatility clustering and spillovers (either forward-to-spot or feedback relationships) were commonly found in these markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Forward-to-spot spillovers were found for interest rates(Crain and Lee 1995), oil(Ng and Pirrong 1996), and wheat(Crain and Lee 1996), whereas feedback spillovers were found for stock indices(Chin et al 1991;Booth and So 2003) and foreign exchange(Wang and Wang 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%