2022
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2308265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Analysis of 1586 MYRIAD Trial Patients Managed with the Same Perioperative Protocol

Abstract: Background: This study investigated the influence of volatile anesthesia (VA) on major complications and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Methods: This post-hoc analysis included 1586 patients from the MYRIAD trial managed using the same perioperative protocol at a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive either volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane) or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The assessed study outcomes were the rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A post hoc analysis of the MYRIAD trial, including 1586 patients using the same perioperative protocol at a single institution which represented the major contributor to the original study, found no significant difference in the primary outcome (mortality at 1 year 2.5% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.53) or in the rates of major complications, including MI, stroke, AKI, prolonged ventilation (>24 h), receipt of high-dose inotropic support (inotropic score >10), and need for mechanical circulatory support, duration of ICU LOS, hospitalization and hospital re-admission during follow-up between groups [ 63 ].…”
Section: Clinical Translation Of Anaesthetic Cardioprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A post hoc analysis of the MYRIAD trial, including 1586 patients using the same perioperative protocol at a single institution which represented the major contributor to the original study, found no significant difference in the primary outcome (mortality at 1 year 2.5% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.53) or in the rates of major complications, including MI, stroke, AKI, prolonged ventilation (>24 h), receipt of high-dose inotropic support (inotropic score >10), and need for mechanical circulatory support, duration of ICU LOS, hospitalization and hospital re-admission during follow-up between groups [ 63 ].…”
Section: Clinical Translation Of Anaesthetic Cardioprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%