2017
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1174711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile profiles of Cabernet Gernischet wine under rain-shelter cultivation and open-field cultivation using solid-phase micro-extraction–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

Abstract: The volatile profiles of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Gernischet wines in vintages 2010 and 2011 from rain-shelter cultivation and open-field cultivation were compared and detected by headspace solid phase micro-extraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results showed that the number and concentration of volatile compounds quantified in wine were lower under rainshelter cultivation compared with open-field cultivation. The strength of the fruity, fatty, caramel, and floral aromas of the 2010 vin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[23] Only one volatile phenol (4-ethyl phenol) was detected from the cherry wine samples, but its presence is very important because it may undermine the final quality of wine. [24] Spontaneous MLF and NoVA led to its formation, but its concentration in this study was quite small, far below its sensory threshold. Such an observation is in agreement with previous reports that a few Lactobacillus species could produce very small amounts of volatile phenols over MLF [25] , due to the presence of a putative pad gene in these strains.…”
Section: Aromatic Profile Of Cherry Winescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…[23] Only one volatile phenol (4-ethyl phenol) was detected from the cherry wine samples, but its presence is very important because it may undermine the final quality of wine. [24] Spontaneous MLF and NoVA led to its formation, but its concentration in this study was quite small, far below its sensory threshold. Such an observation is in agreement with previous reports that a few Lactobacillus species could produce very small amounts of volatile phenols over MLF [25] , due to the presence of a putative pad gene in these strains.…”
Section: Aromatic Profile Of Cherry Winescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Cabernet Sauvignon wine detected 40 µg/L of (S)-3-ethyl-4-methylpentanol without threshold [52], which were less than the results of trials, 0.08 mg/L in Shihezi, 0.10 mg/L in Manas, 0.30 mg/L in Ili River valley, and 0.16 mg/L in Hoxud County, except for no detection in Turpan, respectively. However, the results of He et al [53] found that (S)-3-ethyl-4-methylpentanol in Cabernet Gernischet wine was 193.4 μg/L and 86.7 μg/L in Jingyang County in China in Vintage 2010 and 2011, respectively, and showed further that the number and concentration of volatile compounds quantified in wine were lower under rain-shelter cultivation compared with open-field cultivation. However, effects of rain-shelter cultivation improving the wine quality were obvious in some rainy regions, which demonstrated the obvious contribution of ecological conditions in producing areas.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compared with the OF-cultivated grapes, the RS-cultivated grapes had higher total acidity in 2018 and lower total acidity in 2019. Different impacts of RS cultivation on the total acidity of grape berries have been reported in many studies (Du et al, 2015;Gao et al, 2016;He et al, 2017;Shi et al, 2018). These different results might be related to different varieties, vintages, and/or local climates (Gao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Physicochemical Parameters Analysis Of Shuijing Grape Berriesmentioning
confidence: 96%