2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0077-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile Profile Differences and the Associated Sirex noctilio Activity in Two Host Tree Species in the Northeastern United States

Abstract: Sirex noctilio females are known to be attracted to stem sections of stressed pine trees for oviposition. The volatile profiles and attractiveness of Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) and two chemotypes of Scots pine (P. sylvestris) were compared after stem injection with herbicide. In general, trap captures on herbicide-treated trees were higher than on controls. The high-carene chemotype of Scots pine captured the highest numbers of females, followed by the low-carene chemotype, and finally the Eastern whit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Böröczky et al [14] found that a P . sylvestris chemotype with high amounts of the volatile carene was more attractive to female S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Böröczky et al [14] found that a P . sylvestris chemotype with high amounts of the volatile carene was more attractive to female S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volatiles (α- and β-pinene, carene, and others) emitted by stressed pines attract female S . noctilio [1214]. The female first assesses the bark with her antennae, then probes and eventually drills into the bark with her ovipositor [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying mechanisms determining host susceptibility and preference are not well known for siricids, but may be related to species‐level differences in host tree chemistry (Böröczky et al ., ), growth rates of A. areolatum , or co‐colonisation patterns by native insects. Components of these interactions are likely reliant on phylogenetic relationships (both insect–plant and insect–fungus–plant) that directly or indirectly affect insect performance (Gripenberg et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the sawfly Neodiprion annulus Schedl tended to oviposit in its natural American pines over P. sylvestris from Europe [74] and stands of native P. pinaster in Galicia experienced more colonization by more species of stem-boring insects than the non-indigenous P. radiata [54]. Attraction of S. noctilio to P. sylvestris is partly related to host volatiles [75], which is consistent with higher trap captures of adult S. noctilio in stands of P. sylvestris than P. resinosa [16]. P. resinosa , at least when they are dying, seem to be as suitable for S. noctilio larvae as P. sylvestris because trap trees of the two species produced comparable numbers of emerging S. noctilio adults [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%