Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile and sensory profiling of cocktail bitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, terpenic compounds (e.g., α -terpinolene and α -terpinene) were significantly more abundant in Seomae mugwort than in A. princeps ; most of these compounds were not detected in A. princeps (e.g., α -terpinene, 1,8-cineole, camphor, and 4-terpineol; Table 6 ). It has been reported that these terpenic compounds possess characteristic woody, citrus, floral, and herbal flavors [ 19 ], which possibly confer more favorable sensory characteristics when consumed in the present study. Importantly, the sensory attributes of volatile compounds are difficult to predict due to potential associations between aromas of different compounds (e.g., synergistic or masking effects) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For instance, terpenic compounds (e.g., α -terpinolene and α -terpinene) were significantly more abundant in Seomae mugwort than in A. princeps ; most of these compounds were not detected in A. princeps (e.g., α -terpinene, 1,8-cineole, camphor, and 4-terpineol; Table 6 ). It has been reported that these terpenic compounds possess characteristic woody, citrus, floral, and herbal flavors [ 19 ], which possibly confer more favorable sensory characteristics when consumed in the present study. Importantly, the sensory attributes of volatile compounds are difficult to predict due to potential associations between aromas of different compounds (e.g., synergistic or masking effects) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this study untargeted, rapid GC and LC analyses were used to establish whether whiskeys were individually discriminable, or discriminable according to age or mashbill. As known flavorants were not targetted for analysis, the volatile and non‐volatile profiles from GC and LC are unable to ‘explain’ the sensory results from DA, as has been established in some other studies with alcoholic beverages . Instead, we would like to determine the degree to which the profile separations by these three methods can be said to be similar—to what degree are the apparent similarities reported above (Figures & ) justifiable?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For this purpose, it is possible to use classification algorithms that allow to distinguish between various products in an efficient and precise way, based only on their chemical profiles. Up to now, many papers have reported possibility of classifying natural bioactive herbal compositions of various complexity—eg …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, many papers have reported possibility of classifying natural bioactive herbal compositions of various complexity-eg. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] LAPV technique 29,30 -large amplitude pulse voltammetry-is an analytical technique based on voltammetric measurements under conditions of temporary cyclic polarization of the working electrode. It is based on application of only dozen of pulses with a constant duration enlarged or reduced by a certain constant voltage value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%