Abstract:This study suggests that the threshold of 8 to define abnormal urinary frequency may not be correct since more than a third of our sample of asymptomatic men voided more than 8 times daily. It is probably inadvisable to apply a single set of normative values to all American men because of significant variability in regional climates and populations.
“…Our study affirmed previous reports that voiding frequency increases with increasing age 6 and increasing V 24 7,14 -16 and that Vol/Void decreases with increasing age 4,6,11 and increases with increasing V 24 . 7,8,[14][15][16] These relationships suggest that, when comparing a patient's F 24 or Vol/Void measurement with an expected reference value, the expected reference value should be adjusted for the patient's age and V 24 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Our findings, supported by several others, indicate that age 4,6,11 and V 24 6,7,14-16 have significant effects on Vol/Void and F 24 measurements from asymptomatic persons. Therefore, when comparing a patient's bladder diary measurement to an asymptomatic reference population, the reference values should be adjusted for the known effects of age and V 24 within the reference population.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, 15 (over 16%) of our 92 asymptomatic volunteers had F 24 s !8, and our maximum F 24 was 14.5. Similarly, in men over 65 Blanker et al 11 report a 75th percentile of 8.3, and Latini et al 6 report a 75th percentile of 9 and a 95th percentile of 12. Even higher upper normal limits are suggested by mean F 24 s in asymptomatic men 60-69 years old reported by Homma et al 5 of 8.8 and by van Haarst et al 7 of 8.03.…”
Our results suggest that reference values of F(24) and Vol/Void should be adjusted for their relationships to the patient's age and V(24). Regression equations expressing these relationships can be used to make these adjustments. From frequency histograms of residuals the difference between the patient's actual and expected reference measurement can be ranked within the reference population as a percentile. We illustrate this method by using our results to calculate age- and V(24)-adjusted 5% "normal limit" tables of F(24), V(avg), and V(max).
“…Our study affirmed previous reports that voiding frequency increases with increasing age 6 and increasing V 24 7,14 -16 and that Vol/Void decreases with increasing age 4,6,11 and increases with increasing V 24 . 7,8,[14][15][16] These relationships suggest that, when comparing a patient's F 24 or Vol/Void measurement with an expected reference value, the expected reference value should be adjusted for the patient's age and V 24 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Our findings, supported by several others, indicate that age 4,6,11 and V 24 6,7,14-16 have significant effects on Vol/Void and F 24 measurements from asymptomatic persons. Therefore, when comparing a patient's bladder diary measurement to an asymptomatic reference population, the reference values should be adjusted for the known effects of age and V 24 within the reference population.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, 15 (over 16%) of our 92 asymptomatic volunteers had F 24 s !8, and our maximum F 24 was 14.5. Similarly, in men over 65 Blanker et al 11 report a 75th percentile of 8.3, and Latini et al 6 report a 75th percentile of 9 and a 95th percentile of 12. Even higher upper normal limits are suggested by mean F 24 s in asymptomatic men 60-69 years old reported by Homma et al 5 of 8.8 and by van Haarst et al 7 of 8.03.…”
Our results suggest that reference values of F(24) and Vol/Void should be adjusted for their relationships to the patient's age and V(24). Regression equations expressing these relationships can be used to make these adjustments. From frequency histograms of residuals the difference between the patient's actual and expected reference measurement can be ranked within the reference population as a percentile. We illustrate this method by using our results to calculate age- and V(24)-adjusted 5% "normal limit" tables of F(24), V(avg), and V(max).
“…Men were found to have higher total fluid intakes and mean VVs than women, whereas women voided more frequently than men, and therefore, had more voids per litre of fluid intake. Moreover, Latini et al 17 found that urinary frequency was related to fluid intake in asymptomatic men. This finding demonstrates that elderly women with LUTS have lower functional bladder capacities.…”
Aim: We evaluated differences between men and women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) combined with nocturia. Methods: A total of 71 age-matched female-male pairs (median 58, range 20-81 years) who had moderate to severe LUTS and nocturia of more than once per night were enrolled in this study. Results: In the younger group (<50 years), the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) results of the sexes were not significantly different. However, although total I-PSS results in the elderly group (Ն50 years) were not significantly different, quality of life index scores for women were higher (P = 0.002). On frequency-volume (FV) charts, mean total daytime voided volume (DVV) was significantly higher in younger men than in younger women (P = 0.017), but the mean nocturnal polyuria index (NPi) for women was higher than that for men (P = 0.047). However, maximum DVV (P = 0.009), mean DVV (P < 0.0001), total DVV (P < 0.0001), and mean nocturnal urine volume (P = 0.009) were significantly higher in elderly men than in elderly women. However, numbers of daytime voids were not different. Conclusion: Elderly women with LUTS have lower functional bladder capacities than elderly men, as suggested by their smaller mean voided volumes. However, no significant differences were observed between numbers of daytime voids, which was probably due to the smaller total daytime voided volumes of elderly women. In addition, although NPi for younger women and nocturnal urine volume for elderly men was higher, no other differences were observed in terms of other night-time parameters.
“…Without controlling for at least some of these factors, defi ning normal urinary frequency may not be very meaningful. However, a variety of investigators have attempted to analyze urinary frequency in asymptomatic individuals [25][26][27][28][29]. A cutoff point of eight voids per 24-hour period has often been used to defi ne abnormal frequency, but these studies would suggest that one third to one half of asymptomatic individuals void nine or more times daily.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.