1988
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(88)90051-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Void growth and coalescence in porous plastic solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
425
2
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 708 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(71 reference statements)
17
425
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the two larger values of the stress ratio, ρ, it is seen that introducing voids in the material leads to overall softening of the material during void growth. This is due to void growth toward coalescence (Koplik and Needleman, 1988). For ρ = 0.75 the strain level at which the softening begins is significantly smaller than for ρ = 0.50 (T ≈ 1.3), due to much more dramatic void growth at low strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the two larger values of the stress ratio, ρ, it is seen that introducing voids in the material leads to overall softening of the material during void growth. This is due to void growth toward coalescence (Koplik and Needleman, 1988). For ρ = 0.75 the strain level at which the softening begins is significantly smaller than for ρ = 0.50 (T ≈ 1.3), due to much more dramatic void growth at low strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The largest value of ρ = 0.75 corresponds to the triaxiality ratio T ≈ 3.3, which is roughly the triaxiality in in the vicinity of a crack tip for lightly hardening solids (Koplik and Needleman, 1988). Figure 3b the size of the cell (R v /R c = 0.2) the void volume fraction is f ≈ 5.33 · 10 −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the critical void volume fraction f c and the value at failure f f , from the literature are applied. Note that for a single f 0 the values of f c and f f as fitted to cell model simulations [8][9][10] differ among each other and deviate considerably from the heuristically chosen parameter set in [3]. The obtained R-curves are shown in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%