Interspeech 2008 2008
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2008-699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voicing influences the saliency of place of articulation in audio-visual speech perception in babble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In syllable initial position, articulators are less tense in the production of syllables with short VOT in comparison to syllables with long VOT which are also aspirated. Studies in audiovisual perception with diotic stimuli have shown higher identification and higher audiovisual integration of voiced syllables than voiceless syllables [5,38]. The present study observed that under dichotic AV listening conditions, a visual segment congruent to the auditory component presented to either ear increases correct identification of the respective auditory segment, and this influence of the visual segment overrides the otherwise observed right ear advantage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In syllable initial position, articulators are less tense in the production of syllables with short VOT in comparison to syllables with long VOT which are also aspirated. Studies in audiovisual perception with diotic stimuli have shown higher identification and higher audiovisual integration of voiced syllables than voiceless syllables [5,38]. The present study observed that under dichotic AV listening conditions, a visual segment congruent to the auditory component presented to either ear increases correct identification of the respective auditory segment, and this influence of the visual segment overrides the otherwise observed right ear advantage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In AV speech, fusion perception in incongruent AV conditions is more for voiced stop consonants than for unvoiced stops (in other words, stops with shorter VOT than longer VOT) [5]. Alm & Behne [38] attributed greater identification of POA of voiced stops compared to voiceless stops to the distinct spectral distribution of voiced stops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%