2000
DOI: 10.1177/088610990001500204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voices of Welfare Reform: Bureaucratic Rationality Versus the Perceptions of Welfare Participants

Abstract: This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by other research, transportation was a greater impediment for welfare clients in rural counties (Pindus, 2001;Tickamyer et al, 2000;Transit Cooperative Research Program, 1998). Public transit systems serve nine metropolitan areas of Kentucky such as Louisville, Lexington, and Owensboro (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, 1999).…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As suggested by other research, transportation was a greater impediment for welfare clients in rural counties (Pindus, 2001;Tickamyer et al, 2000;Transit Cooperative Research Program, 1998). Public transit systems serve nine metropolitan areas of Kentucky such as Louisville, Lexington, and Owensboro (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, 1999).…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The element that distinguishes their perceptions from those of recipients interviewed in other recent studies (Davis & Hagen, 1996;Nelson, 2002;Seccombe & Battle-Walters, 1998;Tickameyer, 2000) is their use of race to understand their perceptions of problematic interactions within the system that administers welfare benei'its. As was found in the studies noted, women in this study were well aware of the negative popular images of welfare recipients and of the stigma associated with receipt of the benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…al., 1998;Tickameyer, 2000;) illuminate how women on welfare have been forced to justify their own use of the benefit by distancing themselves from the stereotypical "lazy and dependent welfare mother," but less is known about how race factors into the perceptions of white recipients. If the prevailing stereotype is that welfare recipients are African-American, how do poor white welfare recipients interpret receipt of the benefit?…”
Section: Literature Review Race Welfare and Prejudicementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The primary reason for replacing Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), the 60-year-old entitlement program created under the Social Security Act, with TANF was to decrease welfare dependency through employment (Tickamyer, 2000). The four principal components of TANF included ending the guarantee of cash assistance to needy families, eliminating nonfunded federal mandates through implementation of TANF block grants to states, establishing a lifetime limit of 60 months for receiving federal TANF funds, and penalizing states that do not comply with the mandates for work requirements (Albelda, 1996).…”
Section: Barriers To Earned Incomementioning
confidence: 99%