2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icict.2007.375400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voiced/Unvoiced Detection of Speech Signals Using Empirical Mode Decomposition Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It carries higher energy at any frequency within the range of 50-500 Hz which is known as pitch range. When the voiced speech is decomposed into narrowband signals, it is obvious that the subband containing the pitch frequency exhibits higher energy trend [13]. Due to the noise-like nature of the unvoiced speech, it does not consist of any dominating subband.…”
Section: Why Bemd With Fgnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It carries higher energy at any frequency within the range of 50-500 Hz which is known as pitch range. When the voiced speech is decomposed into narrowband signals, it is obvious that the subband containing the pitch frequency exhibits higher energy trend [13]. Due to the noise-like nature of the unvoiced speech, it does not consist of any dominating subband.…”
Section: Why Bemd With Fgnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the pitch range for both male and female utterances lies between 50-500 Hz (Molla et al 2007), a significant portion of the high frequency components is filtered out in the frequency domain. The resultant signal ϕ(n) is termed as pre-filtered speech (PFS) which contains less noise as the high frequency components are mainly due to noise are suppressed.…”
Section: Pitch Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the pitch period of the subband is selected as final pitch which is closer to the preliminary estimated pitch period of the speech frame. Although the performance of the priori pitch based EMD (pEMD) method is better than the NACF (Kasi and Zahorian 2002) and WAC (Shimamura and Kobayashi 2001) (comparison is presented in Molla et al 2007), it is very much sensitive to the priori pitch information which does not tend to any standard pitch estimation method. Pitch estimation is also performed in the time-frequency domain using EMD but these are not noise robust (Huang and Pan 2005;Yang et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The speech signal is being non-stationary these transformations are not suitable enough. As a data adaptive signal analysis tool EMD is recently used for pitch estimation [19,52,53].…”
Section: Pitch Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%