2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2010.5495201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice quality evaluation of various codecs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, wideband (WB) speech (50 to 7000 Hz nominal passband) has a documented higher perceived quality than narrowband (NB) speech (300 to 3400 Hz nominal passband) [1]- [3], but a transition from NB to WB speech coding is perceived as an impairment [4]- [6]. If the transition happens early enough in a speech recording, the value of the WB portion can exceed the harm of the transition, for a net improvement (relative to NB only) in overall speech quality.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, wideband (WB) speech (50 to 7000 Hz nominal passband) has a documented higher perceived quality than narrowband (NB) speech (300 to 3400 Hz nominal passband) [1]- [3], but a transition from NB to WB speech coding is perceived as an impairment [4]- [6]. If the transition happens early enough in a speech recording, the value of the WB portion can exceed the harm of the transition, for a net improvement (relative to NB only) in overall speech quality.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed a subjective speech quality experiment to measure the values of Qi and QCi,Cj(t, τ ) required in (2). We included six types of coding transitions associated with five different speech coding modes.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference stems from the fact that different telephony architectures use different audio codecs for voice data transmission. For example, while the G.711 codec used in high-quality ISDN links and in modern VoIP systems can generally achieve scores higher than 4, the GSM Full Rate voice codec only achieves a maximum score of 3.5 [17,48]. Further, it is likely that the conversion between different voice codecs has a negative impact on voice quality.…”
Section: Phonionmentioning
confidence: 99%