2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
121
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
121
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some researchers go against setting a specific format for any piece of academic writing claiming that it hinders students" creativity (Matsuda & Tardy, 2007), other studies concluded that students see the opposite. For example, in a case study conducted by Li (2007), a doctoral student acknowledged his need to be trained on how to conduct a proper research or paper.…”
Section: Academic Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some researchers go against setting a specific format for any piece of academic writing claiming that it hinders students" creativity (Matsuda & Tardy, 2007), other studies concluded that students see the opposite. For example, in a case study conducted by Li (2007), a doctoral student acknowledged his need to be trained on how to conduct a proper research or paper.…”
Section: Academic Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies by Matsuda and Tardy (Matsuda & Tardy, 2007;Tardy & Matsuda, 2009) highlight the importance of the reader in the construction of the author's voice (see table 5). Instead of using predefined categories, i.e.…”
Section: The Importance Of the Reader In The Construction Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…defining voice features a priori and then identifying these features in the data where the researcher defines voice, Matsuda and Tardy entrusted the reader with the identification of voice features. They analyzed the statements and assessments of peer reviewers, using written reviews as well as interviews as data for their analysis (Matsuda & Tardy, 2007), and thus identified certain features which seem to be important in the construction of the author's voice. Among other features, the readers mentioned breadth of knowledge, theoretical lens, rhetorical moves, and representation/positioning of other scholars in the field -features which go beyond the word and sentence level and which are related to the content of the text.…”
Section: The Importance Of the Reader In The Construction Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations