2017 International Symposium ELMAR 2017
DOI: 10.23919/elmar.2017.8124457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice command recognition using EEG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Large-set Decoding: Majority of works classify a closed-set vocabulary of units such as words [57], [58] and phrasal blocks [30]. This makes the scalability of the protocol to newer unseen test instances difficult.…”
Section: E Methodological Design Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) Large-set Decoding: Majority of works classify a closed-set vocabulary of units such as words [57], [58] and phrasal blocks [30]. This makes the scalability of the protocol to newer unseen test instances difficult.…”
Section: E Methodological Design Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the works in the literature are based on a two-class problem [28], [29]. When a multi-class framework is considered, a significant decrease in performance is observed [30], [31]. The work proposed in this paper not only addresses the multi-class problem but also considers continuous speech.…”
Section: B Related Work : Co-speech Neural Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A closely related work in [20] intends to classify 50 phrases of speech EEG signals with a classification accuracy of 5% . However, the proposed method differs from the above in the band-based feature extraction and classification module and is shown to outperform the same with respect to accuracy and robustness.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, current technologies still suffer from major limitations that require innovative new solutions to overcome. Brain-computer interface (BCI) devices that utilize neural signals from invasive implants remain inaccessible for the majority of their target user population [40], whereas BCI devices that decode from electroencephalography (EEG) signals remain insufficiently fast with low accuracy and a limited range of classification abilities [32,35,36]. Ultimately, the most realistic chance for wide-spread application of speech decoding technology will require a non-invasive method that can achieve a similar classification accuracy accomplished by invasive methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%