Abstract:Voice-based interfaces provide new opportunities for firms to interact with consumers along the customer journey. The current work demonstrates across four studies that voice-based (as opposed to text-based) interfaces promote more flow-like user experiences, resulting in more positively-valenced service experiences, and ultimately more favorable behavioral firm outcomes (i.e., contract renewal, conversion rates, and consumer sentiment). Moreover, we also provide evidence for two important boundary conditions … Show more
“…Communication properties, such as speech vs. text, are related to whether consumers perceive an interaction with a CA as easy or difficult to process (Song and Schwarz 2009;Zierau et al 2022). Processing fluency describes the subjective feelings of ease or difficulty that consumers experience when mentally processing information, which is also referred to as meta-cognitive experience (Graf et al 2018;Novemsky et al 2007).…”
Section: The Role Of Processing Fluency In Purchase Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test our research model, we used a custom-made conversational interface building on Python and Google WaveNet (Zierau et al 2022). The interface provides the ability to model both speech-and text-based conversational interactions.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the synchronous nature of speech-based interactions, it is to be expected that this deleterious effect on processing fluency is amplified for product combinations that require careful deliberation (e.g., comparing multiple product combinations). At the same time, prior research has shown that speech-based interfaces can positively affect a wide range of affective user experiences including social presence (Qiu and Benbasat 2009) and flow (Zierau et al 2022). As such, future research should take a contextual perspective and investigate when using speech-based CAs becomes beneficial or even more detrimental in e-commerce contexts.…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research on how different recommendation modalities impact downstream consequences for consumers' experience (information processing and evaluation of recommendation persuasiveness and adoption risk) and firms in turn (purchase), and how recommendations should be "designed" for different modalities has been scarce. So far, modality-related research in the technology context has focused on the influence of modality on preference expression (Klesse et al 2015), product search (King et al 2021), user flow experience (Zierau et al 2022), the facilitation of different consumer tasks (Rzepka et al 2021) and communication styles (Whang and Im 2021) as well as the influence of the (in)congruence between speaking and listening on recommendation acceptance (Hu et al 2022).…”
“…Communication properties, such as speech vs. text, are related to whether consumers perceive an interaction with a CA as easy or difficult to process (Song and Schwarz 2009;Zierau et al 2022). Processing fluency describes the subjective feelings of ease or difficulty that consumers experience when mentally processing information, which is also referred to as meta-cognitive experience (Graf et al 2018;Novemsky et al 2007).…”
Section: The Role Of Processing Fluency In Purchase Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test our research model, we used a custom-made conversational interface building on Python and Google WaveNet (Zierau et al 2022). The interface provides the ability to model both speech-and text-based conversational interactions.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the synchronous nature of speech-based interactions, it is to be expected that this deleterious effect on processing fluency is amplified for product combinations that require careful deliberation (e.g., comparing multiple product combinations). At the same time, prior research has shown that speech-based interfaces can positively affect a wide range of affective user experiences including social presence (Qiu and Benbasat 2009) and flow (Zierau et al 2022). As such, future research should take a contextual perspective and investigate when using speech-based CAs becomes beneficial or even more detrimental in e-commerce contexts.…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research on how different recommendation modalities impact downstream consequences for consumers' experience (information processing and evaluation of recommendation persuasiveness and adoption risk) and firms in turn (purchase), and how recommendations should be "designed" for different modalities has been scarce. So far, modality-related research in the technology context has focused on the influence of modality on preference expression (Klesse et al 2015), product search (King et al 2021), user flow experience (Zierau et al 2022), the facilitation of different consumer tasks (Rzepka et al 2021) and communication styles (Whang and Im 2021) as well as the influence of the (in)congruence between speaking and listening on recommendation acceptance (Hu et al 2022).…”
“…The recent proliferation of voice-enabled technologies raises the question of how communication modality (voice vs. text) affects response quality and user experience in course evaluations. From extant literature on media richness and multi-format communication, we know that voice-based (as opposed to text-based) communication affords a more synchronous (e.g., more immediate communication) and intuitive (e.g., less formal language, more flexible syntax) interaction experience [10,91]. For instance, [91] show that voice-based interfaces lead to more immersive user experiences when filing an insurance claim, ultimately enhancing a wide range of perceptual and behavioral user outcomes.…”
Section: Social Response Theory To Foster Students' Engagement In Cou...mentioning
Conversational agents (CAs) provide opportunities for improving the interaction in evaluation surveys. To investigate if and how a user-centered conversational evaluation tool impacts users' response quality and their experience, we build EVA - a novel conversational course evaluation tool for educational scenarios. In a field experiment with 128 students, we compared EVA against a static web survey. Our results confirm prior findings from literature about the positive effect of conversational evaluation tools in the domain of education. Second, we then investigate the differences between a voice-based and text-based conversational human-computer interaction of EVA in the same experimental set-up. Against our prior expectation, the students of the voice-based interaction answered with higher information quality but with lower quantity of information compared to the text-based modality. Our findings indicate that using a conversational CA (voice and text-based) results in a higher response quality and user experience compared to a static web survey interface.
Prior research revealed a striking heterogeneity of how consumers view smart objects, from seeing them as helpful partners to merely a useful tool. We draw on mind perception theory to assess whether the attribution of mental states to smart objects reveals differences in consumer–smart object relationships and device usage. We train a language model to unobtrusively predict mind perception in smart objects from consumer‐generated text. We provide a rich set of interpretable linguistic markers for mind perception, drawing on a diverse collection of text‐mining techniques, and demonstrate that greater mind perception is associated with expressing a more communal (vs. instrumental) relationship with the device and using it more expansively. We find converging evidence for these associations using over 20,000 real‐world customer reviews and also provide causal evidence that inducing a more communal (vs. instrumental) relationship with a smart object enhances mind perception and in turn increases the number of tasks consumers engage in with the device. These findings have important implications for the role of mind perception as a novel lens to study consumer–smart object relationships. We offer an easy‐to‐use web interface to access our language model using researchers own data or to fine‐tune the model to entirely new domains.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.