2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(03)01314-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma

Abstract: The SCL and TL surgical procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma resulted in equivalent speech and swallowing functional outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the variability in the results are not known, even if anatomic variations among subjects (number of arytenoids removed, reconstruction type) can be expected to play a significant role. Voice following SCL has been analysed in a series of papers as reported in Table III; in only two of these, however, endoscopic, aerodynamic, perceptual, acoustic and self-assessment ratings were used, but the number of subjects studied was rather small (n 0/10) (15,20). Endoscopic examination in our group of subjects showed that arytenoid mobility and antero-posterior squeezing of the arytenoid/epiglottal/base-of-tongue complex was generally good while vibration of the neoglottis was sometimes poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for the variability in the results are not known, even if anatomic variations among subjects (number of arytenoids removed, reconstruction type) can be expected to play a significant role. Voice following SCL has been analysed in a series of papers as reported in Table III; in only two of these, however, endoscopic, aerodynamic, perceptual, acoustic and self-assessment ratings were used, but the number of subjects studied was rather small (n 0/10) (15,20). Endoscopic examination in our group of subjects showed that arytenoid mobility and antero-posterior squeezing of the arytenoid/epiglottal/base-of-tongue complex was generally good while vibration of the neoglottis was sometimes poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values reported by Bron et al (6), however, are very close to our calculations, confirming that SCL voice is very breathy and rough. As for acoustic analysis, jitter% and shimmer% have been widely used (17,18,20,21,25). We preferred not to perform any perturbation analysis, since spectrographic results showed a high percentage of subjects (35%) with non-harmonic voice, and therefore not suitable for this kind of analysis, as suggested by Titze's recommendations (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,11 Acoustic and aerodynamic measures are abnormal or unable to be validly measured. 8,11 Speech is intelligible, except in noisy environments, 6,12 but is characterized by an abnormal speaking rate and phrasing. 13 We undertook a pilot study to describe changes in the swallowing and vocal function of patients with SCPL over the first postoperative year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of both groups are equivalent related to speech intelligibility and voice quality. However, on the path to complete oral feeding, hemilaryngectomized patients require considerably more training in swallowing [106]. The speech findings, however, are not supported by other authors who certify speech advantage for hemilaryngectomy.…”
Section: Ability To Speak and Swallowmentioning
confidence: 77%