2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12186-014-9119-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocational Education Students’ Generic Working Life Competencies: Developing a Self-Assessment Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some studies had discussed competency level as a student outcome for vocational education (e.g. Khaled et al, 2014;Kyndt et al, 2014), research that specifically connected this outcome with teacher behaviour can hardly be found. Thus, the connections between teacher behaviour and student competency level is not yet clear.…”
Section: Research On Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour and Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies had discussed competency level as a student outcome for vocational education (e.g. Khaled et al, 2014;Kyndt et al, 2014), research that specifically connected this outcome with teacher behaviour can hardly be found. Thus, the connections between teacher behaviour and student competency level is not yet clear.…”
Section: Research On Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour and Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generic skills can be explored using self-reports if valid instruments are used. In addition, selfreports can be used to develop students' reflection skills and help students to recognize and evaluate their generic skills (Kyndt et al, 2014). However, this review study showed that intervention and longitudinal studies are needed but such study designs are demanding and require greater resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by Kyndt et al (2014), these moderate values can indicate that the underlying constructs in themselves are not stable over time. This is in line with the conceptualisation of team entitativity as a dynamic construct.…”
Section: Test-retest Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%