2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00180-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocalisation in chicks (Gallus gallus dom.) during stepwise social isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
61
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the PF is 3600 Hz the probability of a positive response of the chicks outside the box is higher than 0.98 (P < 0.001). These findings are consistent with the findings of Montevecchi et al and Marx et al (Montevecchi et al, 1973;Marx et al, 2001;Feltenstein et al, 2002) in which the important effect of social isolation on vocalisation emitted by chicks is described.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the PF is 3600 Hz the probability of a positive response of the chicks outside the box is higher than 0.98 (P < 0.001). These findings are consistent with the findings of Montevecchi et al and Marx et al (Montevecchi et al, 1973;Marx et al, 2001;Feltenstein et al, 2002) in which the important effect of social isolation on vocalisation emitted by chicks is described.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, when other chicks were introduced into the box, the vocalisation sounds were less frequently emitted by the animals. These findings are consistent with studies on social-separation stress effects on vocalisation (Montevecchi et al, 1973;Marx et al, 2001;Feltenstein et al, 2002). These authors classified these particular vocalisations as sounds induced by stress situations such as social isolation, and they defined them as distress calls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations