2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal information and the navigation of social decisions in bats: Is social complexity linked to vocal complexity?

Abstract: To make adaptive behavioural decisions, animals must acquire and process information from their natural and social environment. Reducing uncertainty regarding the actions and goals of conspecifics is especially important for group‐living animals. Bats are often highly gregarious and use versatile social vocalizations to mediate social interactions. These social vocalizations encode a substantial amount of ecologically relevant information, such as individual identity, sex and kin. Decoding this information ena… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes the physical characteristics of the signals produced, the quantity of information they convey, the specific properties of features encoding information but also the cognitive abilities of the individuals to analyse the received signal. Evidence for a positive correlation between social and vocal complexity is found in several taxa: birds [ 10 ], bats [ 11 ], rodents [ 12 ], primates [ 13 ], mongoose species [ 14 ], whales [ 15 ] and phocid seals [ 16 , 17 ]. For species living in dense groups, vocal complexity usually causes an increase in the vocal repertoire size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes the physical characteristics of the signals produced, the quantity of information they convey, the specific properties of features encoding information but also the cognitive abilities of the individuals to analyse the received signal. Evidence for a positive correlation between social and vocal complexity is found in several taxa: birds [ 10 ], bats [ 11 ], rodents [ 12 ], primates [ 13 ], mongoose species [ 14 ], whales [ 15 ] and phocid seals [ 16 , 17 ]. For species living in dense groups, vocal complexity usually causes an increase in the vocal repertoire size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a constrained environment, it is particularly challenging for emitters to produce signals in which information is surely and reliably conveyed. From the receiver perspective, reducing uncertainty regarding the identity (age, sex, social or reproductive status) of a signalling conspecific and decoding the information contained in the received signal is crucial to respond to a given situation [ 11 ]. We investigate how CFSs may overcome these constraints and minimize interference among conspecifics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knörnschild, Fernandez, and Nagy () compare the complexity of calls, and the role of complex social environments for intraspecific communication between different species of bats. Bat calls encode information on individual identity, sex and relatedness, which receivers can use to make decisions about mate choice, territorial defence, resource allocation and cooperation.…”
Section: Evolutionary Ecology Of Social Decisions In the Light Of Senmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these gregarious species, social interactions are complicated by the simultaneous co-existence of many individuals (Aubin and Jouventin 1998): animals frequently interact with many different individuals in a variety of social contexts. It is therefore crucial that animals are able to accurately identify surrounding conspecifics to be able to adjust their behavioural responses accordingly, with the aim of limiting interactions to relevant situations only (Knörnschild et al 2020). An understanding of individual recognition processes in these socially complex species would improve our ability to decipher communication strategies in animal species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%