2006
DOI: 10.1139/z06-055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal individuality as a potential long-term monitoring tool for Western Screech-owls, Megascops kennicottii

Abstract: Recent studies suggest that individually distinctive vocalizations found in many avian species can be used in population monitoring. In this study we assessed whether vocal identification of male Western Screech-owls (Megascops kennicottii (Elliot, 1867)) was possible, and if it could be applied as a long-term monitoring tool. Recordings were collected between 2001 and 2003 from 28 territories on southern and central Vancouver Island. As a quantitative descriptor of the calls, a total of 17 variables were meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual distinctness of anuran vocalisations can be used as a non-invasive bioacoustic tool in biological conservation to census threatened populations (Tripp and Otter, 2006). This tech nique can be particularly relevant for species with small populations and/or low reproduction rates and could be used to monitor populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual distinctness of anuran vocalisations can be used as a non-invasive bioacoustic tool in biological conservation to census threatened populations (Tripp and Otter, 2006). This tech nique can be particularly relevant for species with small populations and/or low reproduction rates and could be used to monitor populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual call repertoire, variation, plasticity and change over time might be underestimated (Narins et al 2000;Jansen et al 2016b) and knowledge on the effective signal space of individuals, populations or species might be of taxonomic relevance. Automated recorders and signal processing are helpful in bioacoustical monitoring approaches (e.g., Terry et al 2005;Tripp & Otter 2006;Bardeli et al 2010;Laiolo 2010;Blumstein et al 2011) and thus in ecological studies and conservation. There are several recent works using modern passive recording devices for the estimation of biodiversity in holistic approaches (e.g., Sueur et al 2008b;Blumstein et al 2011;Depraetere et al 2012;Gasc et al 2013;Potamitis 2014; for a review see Obrist et al 2010).…”
Section: Automated Recording and Signal Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilbert, McGregor & Tyler 1994; Jones & Smith 1997; Peake et al. 1998; Galeotti & Sacchi 2001; Tripp & Otter 2006). Acoustic signatures have been used to noninvasively individually identify or census a wide variety of birds and mammals including African wild dogs ( Lycaon pictus , Hartwig 2005), titi monkeys ( Callicebus oenanthe , Aldrich, Molleson & Nekaris 2008), kingfishers ( Halcyon sancta, Saunders & Wooller 1988), owls ( Otus scops , Galeotti & Sacchi 2001; Aegolius acadicus brooksi, Holschuh & Otter 2005; Megascops kennicottii, Tripp & Otter 2006), flycatchers ( Empidonax traillii extimus, Fernandez‐Juricic, del Nevo & Poston 2009), and corncrakes ( Crex crex , Terry, McGregor & Peake 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%