2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2017.8123152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal human-robot interaction inspired by Battle management language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNL is a general term for various restricted versions of natural language that have been constructed with a restricted vocabulary and syntax in order to enable every sentence in the language to be mapped unambiguously to a computerexecutable representation of its meaning [33]. Restricted language models like these have been developed particularly for contexts where avoiding misunderstandings is a critical concern, such as human-robot interactions in military applications [17]. Although primarily an error prevention rather than a security measure, CNL enables natural language input to be validated in the same way as is often done for security purposes in non-speech interfaces [51].…”
Section: Attack and Defence Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNL is a general term for various restricted versions of natural language that have been constructed with a restricted vocabulary and syntax in order to enable every sentence in the language to be mapped unambiguously to a computerexecutable representation of its meaning [33]. Restricted language models like these have been developed particularly for contexts where avoiding misunderstandings is a critical concern, such as human-robot interactions in military applications [17]. Although primarily an error prevention rather than a security measure, CNL enables natural language input to be validated in the same way as is often done for security purposes in non-speech interfaces [51].…”
Section: Attack and Defence Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%