2019
DOI: 10.1353/tech.2019.0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Features: From Voice Identification to Speech Recognition by Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voice recognition is applied not only in identification but also in machine or application control. Such functions have recently been embedded in some FinTech applications (Li and Mills 2019).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulness Dominant Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voice recognition is applied not only in identification but also in machine or application control. Such functions have recently been embedded in some FinTech applications (Li and Mills 2019).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulness Dominant Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the growing literature on sound studies (Rangan, 2019;Sterne, 2012) and speech-recognition software (Li and Mills, 2019;Turow, 2021), the teleprompter can help us rethink how technology is used to standardize speech, recasting some voices as failed attempts to communicate. It shapes what Pooja Rangan (2019: 31) calls the 'audit': 'a mode of speaking and organizing that both produces and is produced by unspoken norms of perceptual discipline or attention' .…”
Section: The Standardization Of Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, historical analysis of the long and difficult process of training machines to hear speech clarifies the fact that hearing is more complex than a simple mechanical process, 'spectrographic data had to be further quantified and expressed mathematically in order for a machine to "objectively" discern patterns that were apparent to the "subjective scale" of the ear or eye' . 18 As Chapter 4 outlines, claiming to be able to measure hearing was largely a matter of technocratic control which was often at odds with the experience of those subjected to such measures.…”
Section: Disability Everywhere and Nowherementioning
confidence: 99%