2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Fatigue Index in Teachers Using Mokken Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work will involve the assignment of labels on a per-sample basis-as individuals with vocal fatigue, especially those with low vocal fatigue, may still produce 'healthy-like' samples, an issue that was also pointed out for classifying vocal hyperfunction using neck surface acceleration [27]. A limitation of the current dataset is that the majority of cases with elevated VFI-1 scores used in this experiment would be considered low vocal fatigue, whereas only four teachers had scores greater than 24, representing clinically high vocal fatigue [23]. We will also further investigate the differences in validation and testing performances, as well as new features and techniques that can yield a better generalization and a deeper understanding of vocal fatigue clinically such as spectral analyses [29] and the analysis of sentence-level data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future work will involve the assignment of labels on a per-sample basis-as individuals with vocal fatigue, especially those with low vocal fatigue, may still produce 'healthy-like' samples, an issue that was also pointed out for classifying vocal hyperfunction using neck surface acceleration [27]. A limitation of the current dataset is that the majority of cases with elevated VFI-1 scores used in this experiment would be considered low vocal fatigue, whereas only four teachers had scores greater than 24, representing clinically high vocal fatigue [23]. We will also further investigate the differences in validation and testing performances, as well as new features and techniques that can yield a better generalization and a deeper understanding of vocal fatigue clinically such as spectral analyses [29] and the analysis of sentence-level data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Second, since some of the features used are amplitude-dependent, the lack of amplitude normalization in the sEMG signals extracted from different subjects could exacerbate the error under the inter-subject constraint. Third, we may still have insufficiently diverse data in order for the classifier to achieve better generalization (only four subjects scored high in the clinical range of the VFI-1, that is, >24 [23]). In the next sections, these three potential problems were investigated.…”
Section: Classifying Vowel Productions Based On Self-reported Vfi-1 S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the absence of a perceivable voice disorder, a relevant health issue for these professionals is voice fatigue, ascribed to the perception of vocal effort and laryngeal discomfort, which are commonly mitigated by voice rest and [9] by means of individual behavioral strategies [10] . Although a shared definition of voice fatigue is currently missing, it should be considered a complex condition influenced by different underlying mechanisms across subjects and by individual characteristics [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%