Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2010.5537742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI implementation of a low-complexity LLL lattice reduction algorithm for MIMO detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It offers the highest throughput (832.5 Mb/s @ 333 MHz) and the lowest number of average cycles per LR-reduced matrix. However, the tradeoff is that the design relies on limiting of the number of column swaps in the LLL reduction process to only 4, which leads to a significant deviation from ML diversity as can be observed in the BER performance results in [15]. This problem has been alleviated by the proposed fixed-throughput ML diversity design in this paper.…”
Section: B Design Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It offers the highest throughput (832.5 Mb/s @ 333 MHz) and the lowest number of average cycles per LR-reduced matrix. However, the tradeoff is that the design relies on limiting of the number of column swaps in the LLL reduction process to only 4, which leads to a significant deviation from ML diversity as can be observed in the BER performance results in [15]. This problem has been alleviated by the proposed fixed-throughput ML diversity design in this paper.…”
Section: B Design Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2) The proposed LR design in this paper has a significant advantage of being the only design with fixed throughput, independent of the correlation of the channel matrix. For the other reported LR implementations, the throughput and processing latency results represent an average, since their exact number of required cycles depends on the correlation of the input matrix R. 3) One important LR implementation is the design presented in [15]. It offers the highest throughput (832.5 Mb/s @ 333 MHz) and the lowest number of average cycles per LR-reduced matrix.…”
Section: B Design Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this implementation only considers slower off-the-shelf FPGA components, including the use of square root and division operations that have not been optimized. The FPGA and application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementation [34] claims to achieve a "fivefold improvement in terms of throughput at the cost of only slightly more FPGA resources" over [26] and [32]. This work uses CORDIC units along with a modification of the LLL algorithm by replacing the size-reduction criterion with the reverse Siegel condition.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason we are unable to provide a direct comparison of our architecture with previously published work. Nevertheless, it is still possible to compare our implementation with three state-of-the-art VLSI implementations of hard-output LRAD-based MIMO detectors [32], [26], [34].…”
Section: Comparisons With Previously Published Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation