1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9260(87)90018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI computations: from physics to algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a measure of efficiency both chip area (A) and time (T) between two successive DFT computations (set-up times are neglected since only throughput is of interest) are of importance. Asymptotic lower bounds for the product A-T 2 have been reported for the FFT [116] and lead to ~(2AT2(DFT(N)) = N 2 log2(N), (78) that is, no circuit will achieve a better behavior than (78) for large N. Interestingly, this lower bound is achieved by several algorithms, notably the algorithms based on shuffle-exchange networks and the ones based on square grids [96,114]. The trouble with these optimal schemes is that they outperform more traditional ones, like the cascade connection with variable delay [98] (which is asymptotically sub-optimal), only for extremely large Ns and are therefore not relevant in practice [96].…”
Section: Vlsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a measure of efficiency both chip area (A) and time (T) between two successive DFT computations (set-up times are neglected since only throughput is of interest) are of importance. Asymptotic lower bounds for the product A-T 2 have been reported for the FFT [116] and lead to ~(2AT2(DFT(N)) = N 2 log2(N), (78) that is, no circuit will achieve a better behavior than (78) for large N. Interestingly, this lower bound is achieved by several algorithms, notably the algorithms based on shuffle-exchange networks and the ones based on square grids [96,114]. The trouble with these optimal schemes is that they outperform more traditional ones, like the cascade connection with variable delay [98] (which is asymptotically sub-optimal), only for extremely large Ns and are therefore not relevant in practice [96].…”
Section: Vlsimentioning
confidence: 99%