2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2012.00158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VizualAge: A Novel Approach to Laser Ablation ICP‐MS U‐Pb Geochronology Data Reduction

Abstract: VizualAge, a new computer software tool for analysing U‐Pb data obtained by laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry, was developed. It consists of a data reduction scheme (DRS) for Iolite (a general mass spectrometry data analysis tool) as well as visualisation routines. In addition to the U/Pb and Th/Pb ages calculated by Iolite’s U‐Pb geochronology DRS, VizualAge also calculates 207Pb/206Pb ages and common Pb corrections for each time‐slice of raw data. Importantly, VizualAge allows one t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
295
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 722 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
295
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Paton et al, 2010, G3. 2 2σ uncertainties propagated according to Paton et al, 2010, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios, ages and errors are calculated according to Petrus and Kamber (2012), Geostandards Geoanalyt Res.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paton et al, 2010, G3. 2 2σ uncertainties propagated according to Paton et al, 2010, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios, ages and errors are calculated according to Petrus and Kamber (2012), Geostandards Geoanalyt Res.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for individual analytical days. U-Pb data were processed offline using the software Iolite 2.5 (Paton et al 2010(Paton et al , 2011 and the data reduction scheme Visual ages (Petrus and Kamber 2012). Error propagation was carried out using Iolite (Paton et al 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reduction was performed with Iolite 2.5 (Paton et al, 2011;Paton et al, 2010) with DRS 'Visual age' (Petrus and Kamber, 2012). All dates reported in this study are concordant within error, no common Pb correction was applied.…”
Section: Zircon Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%