“…Previously, Day et al [110] could load simulated waste of ∼32 wt% (against ∼10 wt% in borosilicate glass) for the high sulfate LAW (Hanford), to ∼40 wt% (against ∼20 wt% in borosilicate glass) for the SBW (INEEL), to ∼75 wt% (against ∼15 wt% in borosilicate glass) for the high chrome HLW (Hanford). The better solubility of Cr within Fe phosphate melts is due to its occurrence in +3 state only (instead of Cr 3+ , Cr 4+ , Cr 6+ as found in silicate melts; [37]) which makes it possible to incorporate the cation through breaking P O double bonds [120].Šantić et al [121] investigated the effect of Cr 2 O 3 additions on xCr 2 O 3 -(40 − x)Fe 2 O 3 -60P 2 O 5 (where 0 < x < 10, x is in mol%) pyrophosphate (Q 1 , O/P molar ratio ∼3.5) and noted that replacement of Fe 2 O 3 by Cr 2 O 3 up to 5 mol% does not produce any significant structural changes, however higher loading (e.g. 10 mol%) promote crystallization of chromium orthophosphate (-CrPO 4 ) and iron pyrophosphate (Fe 3 (P 2 O 7 ) 2 ) within the matrix.…”