2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-006-0240-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitrification of goat preantral follicles enclosed in ovarian tissue by using conventional and solid-surface vitrification methods

Abstract: Caprine preantral follicles within ovarian fragments were exposed to or vitrified in the presence of sucrose, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), or various combinations thereof. The fragments were cryopreserved by using either a conventional (CV) or a solid-surface vitrification (SSV) protocol, and the cryoprotectants were removed by equilibrating vitrified ovarian fragments in "warming solution" consisting of minimum essential medium and heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (MEM(+)) followed by was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding previous studies on preservation of preantral follicles provided important knowledge on this issue, approaches were limited to analysis of morphology, which is not always correlated with the viability of follicles (Santos et al, 2007). Therefore, in the present work, viability assessment using the trypan blue dye exclusion test was employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding previous studies on preservation of preantral follicles provided important knowledge on this issue, approaches were limited to analysis of morphology, which is not always correlated with the viability of follicles (Santos et al, 2007). Therefore, in the present work, viability assessment using the trypan blue dye exclusion test was employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower concentrations of cryoprotectant are required in freezing media for slow cooling, which reduces the risk of toxic and osmotic damage to cells, but this is insufficient to prevent ice crystal formation jeopardizing cell survival during the freezing procedures (Vajta 2006). Vitrification, though still regarded as a relatively novel freezing method, has recently been reported as an effective alternative method for the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in various species, including mouse (Wang et al 2009), rat (Deng et al 2009), pig (Gandolfi et al 2006), goat (Santos et al 2007), sheep (Al-aghbari & Menino 2002, Courbiere et al 2006, monkey (Yeoman et al 2005), and human (Keros et al 2009, Zhou et al 2010. It combines a high cooling rate with a high concentration of cryoprotectant in the vitrification media, which rapidly dehydrates the cells and prevents water from precipitating as ice (Vajta 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this method, tissue samples are normally placed in a very small volume of vitrification solution and cooled on a sterile metal surface to maximize the cooling rate, and minimize the potential for contamination of samples by LN 2 . Measures of survival of vitrified ovarian tissue after cryopreservation have included morphological examination (histology), viability assessment by viability staining or development in vitro or in vivo culture (Yeoman et al 2005, Santos et al 2007, Aerts et al 2008. There are, however, limited data on the effects on the function of ovarian tissue vitrified using solid surface vitrification systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%