2011
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin K requirement and reproduction in bromadiolone‐resistant Norway rats

Abstract: The VKOR variant Tyr139Cys causes considerable physiological cost in Norway rats in terms of vitamin K requirement and reproduction. This may affect the distribution and spread of resistant individuals in the wild. Decreased litter size of resistant parents seems to be due to lowered female reproductive performance, as there was no significant effect of the mutation on any aspects of male reproduction considered, but this requires further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 ). It is thus conceivable that a decrease in the VKOR catalytic efficiency (as observed for L120Q, Y139C/F/C) associated or not with an elevated 3‐OH‐vit K production (as observed for mutations in position 139) might cause an increase in dietary requirements of vit K. Indeed, severe increase in dietary requirements was described in resistant rats from Denmark and Germany (i.e., certainly homozygous for Y139C) [16,19] and from Wales (i.e., certainly homozygous for Y139S) [26]. On the contrary, vit K requirements in resistant rats from Scotland (i.e., homozygous for L128Q) [27] are described to be similar to vit K requirements of susceptible rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 ). It is thus conceivable that a decrease in the VKOR catalytic efficiency (as observed for L120Q, Y139C/F/C) associated or not with an elevated 3‐OH‐vit K production (as observed for mutations in position 139) might cause an increase in dietary requirements of vit K. Indeed, severe increase in dietary requirements was described in resistant rats from Denmark and Germany (i.e., certainly homozygous for Y139C) [16,19] and from Wales (i.e., certainly homozygous for Y139S) [26]. On the contrary, vit K requirements in resistant rats from Scotland (i.e., homozygous for L128Q) [27] are described to be similar to vit K requirements of susceptible rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these observations are totally in agreement with the catalytic results obtained in this study. Furthermore, in rat homozygous for Y139C, retarded growth [16,17] and cardiovascular calcifications [19] were reported. Both are to be considered as the consequence of a deficiency in vit K. Indeed, Matrix Gla protein (MGP), a VKDP which is considered as an inhibitor of the tissue calcification, is effective under its gamma-carboxylated form only [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Body weight measurements were included in the current study due to the findings of Smith et al that in offspring of wild-caught warfarin resistant rats weight conveyed social dominance (Smith et al, 1994). Differences in the weight of bromadiolone-resistant Norway rats have been shown to effect reproductive success and therefore the spread of resistance (Jacob et al, 2012). Exploiting this "selective disadvantage" has been cited as one way to manage anticoagulant resistance (Greaves, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that because of pleiotropic costs (on vitamin K requirements, reduced fecundity and growth rate) that anticoagulant resistant rats (from some regions) are at a selective disadvantage in the absence of anticoagulant use compared to susceptible individuals (Jacob et al 2012;Smith et al 1991). Intuitively therefore, these susceptible rats should out-compete their resistant counterparts in the absence of exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides, and it follows that resistance-management strategies should, where possible, include the use of non-anticoagulant rodenticides and non-rodenticide approaches in order to remove selection pressure, and to remove resistant individuals (Buckle 2013;Greaves 1995;Lambert et al 2008;Quy et al 1995;Smith & Greaves 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%