1. Estimations of monoamine oxidase (m.o.) activity in suspensions of frog liver taken at monthly intervals showed that activity was relatively constant during the greater part of the year (mean value 8\m=.\6\ m=+-\ 0\m=.\332 \g=m\l .O2/15 min/mg colloid nitrogen), but it rose to a significantly higher level from August to November inclusive (mean 11\m=.\7\ m=+-\ 0\m=.\513\g=m\l .O2/15 min/mg colloid nitrogen).2. The pattern of seasonal variation in enzyme activity showed no correspondence with the annual cycle of change in the thyroid gland, nor was there any correlation between m.o. activity of the liver and the histological appearance of the thyroid in individual frogs.3. Inhibition of m.o. in vivo by iproniazid elicited a hyperglycaemic response to excitement in previously unresponsive frogs which was almost identical with that obtained after treatment with thyroxine and iproniazid.4. There was no evidence that treatment with thyroxine led to any alteration in the activity of liver m.o.5. It is concluded that m.o. is not an important factor in the inactivation of catechol amines in the strongly stimulated frog, but the possibility is discussed that under natural conditions of lower stress the high enzyme activity from August to November might be one factor tending to limit mobilization of liver glycogen.The general field of our knowledge of amine inactivation by monoamine oxidase under physiological conditions has recently been reviewed by Davison [1958]. The present paper, however, is mainly concerned with the long-established finding that removal of the thyroid gland from various mammals leads to a marked reduction in the hyperglycaemia following injection of adrenaline, while thyroid feeding enhances this response [Burn & Marks, 1925]. Spinks & Burn [1952] extended the scope of this work when they determined the monoamine oxidase (µ.o.) activity in suspensions of fiver from rabbits and rats in widely different, experimentally induced, thyroid states. They found a significant increase in activity after thyroidectomy, and therefore attributed the decreased sensitivity to adrenaline shown by such animals to the accelerated oxidation of the amine by M.o. This view, however, was not supported by Holtz, Stock & Westermann [1956], as they found that M.o. activity of liver extracts was either increased or not significantly altered when rabbits, guinea-pigs and rats were treated with thyroxine or triiodothyronine. As the frog is an animal which naturally shows wide seasonal fluctuations in thyroid activity coupled with marked changes in the hyperglycaemic response to adrenaline or excitement [Smith, 1954], it was obviously a very suitable animal for a further investigation of a possible association between the thyroid hormone and M.o. The present paper includes the results of a seasonal survey of M.o. activity in the liver of the frog, together with experimental observations on the effects of inhibiting the enzyme or administering thyroid hormone. iq Endoc 19 4