2020
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1915176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Supplements for Prevention of Tuberculosis Infection and Disease

Abstract: BACKGROUND Vitamin D metabolites support innate immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Data from phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation to prevent tuberculosis infection are lacking. METHODS We randomly assigned children who had negative results for M. tuberculosis infection according to the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay (QFT) to receive a weekly oral dose of either 14,000 IU of vitamin D 3 or placebo for 3 years. The primary outcome was a positive QFT result at the 3-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
89
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference reflects the inclusion of null data from four new RCTs in which vitamin D was given in relatively high doses at weekly or monthly intervals over 2-5 years. 41,42,44,45 Null results of these studies contrast with protective effects reported from earlier trials in which smaller daily doses of vitamin D were given over shorter periods. 8,9,13,16 These differing findings suggest that the frequency, amount and duration of vitamin D supplementation may be key determinants of its protective efficacy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference reflects the inclusion of null data from four new RCTs in which vitamin D was given in relatively high doses at weekly or monthly intervals over 2-5 years. 41,42,44,45 Null results of these studies contrast with protective effects reported from earlier trials in which smaller daily doses of vitamin D were given over shorter periods. 8,9,13,16 These differing findings suggest that the frequency, amount and duration of vitamin D supplementation may be key determinants of its protective efficacy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The current study has several strengths: it contains the very latest RCT data available in this fast-moving field, including findings from three large phase 3 trials published in 2020 41,42,44 as well as some as-yet unpublished studies. 46,47 The inclusion of additional studies allowed us to analyse results of placebo-controlled studies vs. high-dose / low-dose studies separately, and gave us the power to investigate reasons for heterogeneity of effect observed across trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection with tuberculosis as defined by a positive QuantiFERON-TB test was the primary outcome with the incidence of clinical tuberculosis and ARIs as secondary outcomes. The weekly vitamin D bolus had no significant impact on any of these outcomes [ 85 ]. This contrasts with a previous study in 247 Mongolian schoolchildren in which daily ingestion of milk fortified with 300 IU of vitamin D3 resulted in a 50% reduction in participant-reported ARIs during the winter [ 86 ].…”
Section: Identifying the Appropriate Vitamin D Target Blood Levels Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 73 ) However, a recent large trial of 8851 Mongolian children found that a weekly vitamin D dose of 14,000 IU taken over 3 years did not prevent acute respiratory or tuberculosis infections, even in those with baseline 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L. ( 74 ) Other trials that have included respiratory infections as an outcome include the CAPS, VITAL, and DO‐Health studies, which gave a daily vitamin D dose, and D‐Health, which gave a monthly bolus dose (Supplemental Table S1). Their results when published are expected to provide further important information about the effect of vitamin D in preventing acute respiratory infections.…”
Section: Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%