2012
DOI: 10.1007/bf03654842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D status and oxidative stress markers in the elderly with impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Daniela Gradinaru,
Claudia Borsa,
Cristina Ionescu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a negative correlation between vitamin D and AOPP levels. Similar results had been reported in previous studies [44,45]. Vitamin D supplementation was accompanied by better glycaemic control and decreased AOPP level as an OS marker [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was a negative correlation between vitamin D and AOPP levels. Similar results had been reported in previous studies [44,45]. Vitamin D supplementation was accompanied by better glycaemic control and decreased AOPP level as an OS marker [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Vitamin D supplementation was accompanied by better glycaemic control and decreased AOPP level as an OS marker [45]. As diabetes progresses and vascular complications such as nephropathy develop, the AOPP level increases and patients with diabetic vascular complications have significantly higher levels of AOPP compared with patients with non‐complicated diabetes [44, 46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gradinaru et al reported a much lower value of 7.2%, which might be due to inclusion of subjects with only good and moderate glycemic control(<8.5%). [37] Similarly Aoucheri et al, Zare-Mirzaie et al, and Dhas et al, reported relatively lower values. [38,39,40] Sheth et al reported values of 8.36% ± 1.79%, which were comparable to those of the current study.…”
Section: Table;5mentioning
confidence: 89%