2012
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D status and determinants of deficiency among non-pregnant Jordanian women of reproductive age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
33
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It found levels of serum 25(OH) vitamin D to be notably higher among rural/semiurban resident populations than among urban ones (28.9 and 26.6 ng/mL, respectively). Other investigations in Middle Eastern contexts have arrived at similar findings19,31,32; for example, a cross-sectional research examining a sample of non-pregnant Jordanian women of reproductive age found that in comparison with women living rurally who had attained at least secondary education, the deficiency prevalence was 1.30 times greater for urban women with the same level of education and 1.18 times greater for urban women who had attained a level of education below secondary 19. These differences in risk levels might be because the UV-B radiation from sunlight is the main human source of vitamin D, so urban residents face a greater risk of vitamin D deficiency because the areas in which they live tend to have higher levels of air pollution which can partially block ultraviolet B photons 33.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It found levels of serum 25(OH) vitamin D to be notably higher among rural/semiurban resident populations than among urban ones (28.9 and 26.6 ng/mL, respectively). Other investigations in Middle Eastern contexts have arrived at similar findings19,31,32; for example, a cross-sectional research examining a sample of non-pregnant Jordanian women of reproductive age found that in comparison with women living rurally who had attained at least secondary education, the deficiency prevalence was 1.30 times greater for urban women with the same level of education and 1.18 times greater for urban women who had attained a level of education below secondary 19. These differences in risk levels might be because the UV-B radiation from sunlight is the main human source of vitamin D, so urban residents face a greater risk of vitamin D deficiency because the areas in which they live tend to have higher levels of air pollution which can partially block ultraviolet B photons 33.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Some authors have demonstrated a correlation between age and vitamin D in a direct [21,22] or indirect manner [23,24], whereas others have found no correlation [25,26]. In agreement with our findings, Nichols et al [27] did not find any association between age and vitamin D status in a survey of Jordanian women aged between 15 and 49 years. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The overwhelming majority of studies revealed 25(OH)D levels in the low teens [25(OH)D 10−15 ng/ml], even considering population-based studies. Consistent predictors across these studies for lower values were age, albeit with differing findings, some studies showing older age to be a risk factor, 57 , 67 , 69 while others point to younger age, 41 , 42 , 77 female gender in adults 41 , 61 , 63 , 72 , 75 , 82 and children, 83 - 89 winter season, sunlight exposure and veiling, 40 , 41 , 44 , 56 , 60 , 63 , 66 , 75 , 78 , 81 , 90 , 92 except in some studies from gulf countries where summer registers lowest values in studies from the United Arab Emirates, 75 , 77 pollution, 43 low calcium or vitamin D dietary intake, 67 , 77 , 80 , 81 , 90 , 92 and exclusive breast feeding in infants 88 . Other predictors included high BMI and /or increased adiposity, 39 , 60 , 66 - 68 , 72 , 93 and lower SES status or educational level 44 , 60 , 64 , 68 , 80 , 83 .The impact of menopause was not consistent across studies, whereas premenopausal women had higher levels in the study from Saudi Arabia, 67 the opposite was found in UAE 77 Table 1.…”
Section: Magnitude Of the Problem And Predictors Of Low Vitamin D Statusmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The first included 4590 subjects and revealed a surprising high mean 25(OH)D level of 73 ng/ml in males and 40 ng/ml in females, 57 levels that remain unmatched in any other study or population. Conversely, a study of 2032 women, age 15−49 y revealed a median vitamin D of 11 ng/ml, 96% of subjects had levels below 20 ng/ml, and 60% were below a cut-off of 12 ng/ml 56 . While the former study used a Biosource assay, the latter used the gold standard LCMS assay to measure vitamin D. Aside from assay differences, reasons for such wide discrepancies remain unexplained.…”
Section: Magnitude Of the Problem And Predictors Of Low Vitamin D Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%