2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10528-021-10038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous meta-analysis [39][40][41], increased risks were found both in rs1544410 and rs731236 polymorphism, which agreed with our results, but decreased risk of rs2228570 was observed in his study. After careful analysis, we supposed the small sample size and different data recruiting methods could contribute to the discrepancy.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the previous meta-analysis [39][40][41], increased risks were found both in rs1544410 and rs731236 polymorphism, which agreed with our results, but decreased risk of rs2228570 was observed in his study. After careful analysis, we supposed the small sample size and different data recruiting methods could contribute to the discrepancy.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, a study carried out in an Asian population (from India) (292 cases/219 controls) reported a statistically significant association between the T genotype of the VDR FokI polymorphism and susceptibility to developing ischemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) ( p = 0.01; OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.17–3.07; TT vs. CC) [ 49 ]. Furthermore, according to the meta-analysis conducted by Tabaei et al (2021) in Caucasian and Asian populations (3741 cases/1998 controls), the T allele of the VDR FokI SNP was significantly associated with the CAD risk in all genetic models including; dominant model ( p = 0.02; OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.06–2.03), recessive model ( p < 0.001; OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.14–1.71), allelic model ( p = 0.01; OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.08–1.76, p = 0.01), TT vs. CC model ( p = 0.02; OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07–2.34), and TC vs. TT model ( p = 0.04; OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.00–1.92), having a strong significant association for the Asian population but not the Caucasian [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to the results of the study carried out by Abouzid et al (2021) they suggest that VDR BsmI -AA genotype is protective of CVD ( p = 0.04) [ 53 ]. Moreover, according to the meta-analysis by Tabaei et al (2021) in Caucasian and Asian populations (6169 cases/2392 controls), VDR ApaI-CC genotype was significantly associated with CAD risk in all genetic models, including: dominant model ( p = 0.002; OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07–1.34), allelic model ( p = 0.004; OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04–1.21), CC vs. AA model ( p = 0.01; OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.44), and AC vs. AA model ( p = 0.007; OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.05–1.33), other than the recessive model ( p = 0.17; OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.96–1.27) [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pathway is closely associated with atherosclerosis, and the pro-in ammatory response of monocytes in CAD requires activation of mTOR [36]. Among 'trans' genes, some studies have reported that VDR gene polymorphisms lead to the development and formation of CAD by affecting changes in serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D. [37,38]. Previous study reported VDR in regulating in ammation through inhibiting the NF-ĸB pathway and activating autophagy [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%