2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Deficiency as a Potential Marker of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Vitamin D seasonality is well documented and our results are in agreement with reported data for significantly higher 25OHD levels in summer and fall (warm season) vs lower 25OHD values in spring and winter (cold season) (28,29). The data regarding testosterone seasonal variations are scarce and controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vitamin D seasonality is well documented and our results are in agreement with reported data for significantly higher 25OHD levels in summer and fall (warm season) vs lower 25OHD values in spring and winter (cold season) (28,29). The data regarding testosterone seasonal variations are scarce and controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Surprisingly, lower median 25OHD values (37.37nmol/L) for the peak season for vitamin D synthesis were reported by Zhang et al for a cohort of 322 men aged 60 to 75 years from South China. More than 71% of their studied patients were vitamin D deficient and only 6.6% fall in the range over 75nmol/L (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five articles (Barassi et al, 2014;Caretta et al, 2016;Krysiak et al, 2018;Sudarevic et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2016) with data compar- …”
Section: Iief-5 Scores In Subjects Without Vitamin D Deficiency Vermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining 15 articles, 8 were excluded; thus, the remaining 7 studies(Barassi, Pezzilli, Colpi, Corsi Romanelli, & Melzi d'Eril, 2014;Basat et al, 2018;Caretta et al, 2016;Farag et al, 2016;Krysiak et al, 2018; Sudarevic et al, 2017;Zhang, Zheng, Wang, & Xiao, 2016) were qualified for our meta-analysis. Of the remaining 15 articles, 8 were excluded; thus, the remaining 7 studies(Barassi, Pezzilli, Colpi, Corsi Romanelli, & Melzi d'Eril, 2014;Basat et al, 2018;Caretta et al, 2016;Farag et al, 2016;Krysiak et al, 2018; Sudarevic et al, 2017;Zhang, Zheng, Wang, & Xiao, 2016) were qualified for our meta-analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%